Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
SHRI HARIBHAU JAWAJI GHODE V/S M/S SANKALP CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.Anand Patwardhan
Respondant Advocate Ms.A.S. Shelke
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAITransfer Application No. TA/11/61. M/S SANKALP CONSTRUCTIONSANKALP NAGARI S NO 82/2/2 VISHRANT WADI ROAD DHANORI PUNE 411015PUNEMAHARASHTRA 2. SHRI PRABHAKAR PANDURANG BHOSALE SANKALPI NAGARI S NO...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
B G SHIRKE CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD V/S SHREE AHIRESHWAR TRANSPORT SERVICE SERVICE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANGRAMSINGH YADAV
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3941. SHREE AHIRESHWAR TRANSPORT SERVICE SERVICE HEAD OFFICE AT SHOP NO 55 A/B OPP MAYUR HOTEL PUNE BANGLORE HIGHWAY KATRAJ PUNE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI ARV...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SEEMA CONSTRUCTION CO. V/S MR DILIPSINH, SON OF MRS MULABHAI GOHIL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/175(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/01/2012 in Case No. 387/2011 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. MR DILIPSINH, SON OF MRS MULABHAI GOHIL302/SAI-ASHISH-2, LEGAL NENCEY COLONY BOR...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S KANAKAIA CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. V/S MRS.RANJANA CHANDRAKANT KHATKUL
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. 2008/6321. MRS.RANJANA CHANDRAKANT KHATKUL 8,DENA BANK STAFF SHIVNERI HSG. SOCIETY, L.T.ROAD, BORIVALI (W)MUMBAI 400 092 ..........
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ROYAL GUJRAT CONSTRUCTION V/S K. B. SAPNAR
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/3491. K. B. SAPNAR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ROYAL GUJRAT CONSTRUCTION............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Pranali Sawant PRESIDENT Smt. Sujata Patankar MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER// निशाणी 1 वरील आदेश //   &#...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S SANKALP CONSTRUCTION V/S SHRI VILAS ANANDA BHOSALE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D G SANT
Respondant Advocate Mr.Raut
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/465(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/04/2010 in Case No. 120/2007 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. SHRI VILAS ANANDA BHOSALE S NO BHIMNAGAR S NO 46 DHANORI ROAD VISHRANTWADI P...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RANJAN MOHINDRA V/S M/S. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 02/05/2011 in Complaint No. 16/2004 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, 15UGF, INDRAPRAKASH, 21, BARAKHAMBA ROAD,...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2012
SUPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY V/S AADHYATMA MANGEMENTS PVT.LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/00/4841. AADHYATMA MANGEMENTS PVT.LTD.5, ZEFRICA, 1ST FLR, SASMIRA MARG, WORLI, MUMBAI-25............Complainant(s)Versus1. SUPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANYMANGAL MARUTI, PLOT NO.1...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2000
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maa Vaishnavi Land Developers and Construction Co. , Nagpur V/S Sau. Vijaya Bhimrao Dhanvijay
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Gaidhane
Respondant Advocate ADV.BAGADE
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/10/1091. Sau. Vijaya Bhimrao DhanvijayNagpurNagpurMAHARASHTRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Maa Vaishnavi Land Developers a...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S AKASHGANGA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD V/S SMT JYOTSNA PRAVINKUMAR VADERA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/12/18(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/01/2012 in Case No. 55/2010 of District Nashik)1. SMT JYOTSNA PRAVINKUMAR VADERA FLAT NO 310 C WING KAMDHENU SOCIETY SATYANAGAR BORIVALI...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.