Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
INDICO CONSTRUCTION CO., THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI. B.P.KARKERA V/S SHRI. HIMATLAL SAKARCHAND MALKAN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A PATWARDHAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/2841. SHRI. HIMATLAL SAKARCHAND MALKAN U U BHAT MARG 255 KAMALA SADAN MATUNGA MUMBAI 400019MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA 2. SHRI HEMANT HIMATLAL MALKAN U U BHAT MARG 255 KA...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S SATGURU -KNS CONSTRUCTION V/S SHRI CHANDRAKANT M VORA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate LALIT CHEDA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/2411. SHRI CHANDRAKANT M VORA SATGURU DRISTI MIRANI NAGAR VALJI LADHA ROAD MULUND WEST MUMBAIMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S SATGURU -KNS ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHRI. SAKHARAM AMRUTRAO PANDIT V/S M/S. ASHISH CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. a/04/653(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/02/2004 in Case No. 414/1998 of District Nashik)1. M/S. ASHISH CONSTRUCTIONASHISH SHELTERS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., PLOT NO. D-54, SINNAR INDU...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Mr.Deepak Lodha, Partner Lodha Construction (Dombivli) V/S Mr.Vinod S.Kamble
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/361. Mr.Vinod S.Kamble2/4, E-1, Ashirwad CHS, Sector-15, Airoli, Navi Mumbai............Complainant(s)Versus1. Mr.Deepak Lodha, Partner Lodha Construction (Dombivli)216, Shah & Nahar Estate, Dr.E.Moses Road, Worli, Mumbai-400018.............Opp.Party(s) B...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GURUDATTA CONSTRUCTION V/S SAU SINDHU KAILAS GAWADE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/138(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/12/2008 in Case No. 643/2005 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. M/S GURUDATTA CONSTRUCTIONC/O MARUTI THITE AT PO - WARUDE TAL KHED PUNEMahar...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SOU SINDHU KAILAS GAWADE V/S M/S GURUDATTA CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U P WARUNJIKAR
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/138(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/12/2008 in Case No. 643/2005 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. M/S GURUDATTA CONSTRUCTIONC/O MARUTI THITE AT PO - WARUDE TAL KHED PUNEMahar...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SAI PUSHPA CONSTRUCTION V/S SMT.ARCHANA MARUTI SHINGADE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mrs.Anita Marathe
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ranjana Todankar
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/667(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/03/2008 in Case No. CC/07/106 of District Raigarh)1. SMT.ARCHANA MARUTI SHINGADESAI SHARAN CO-OP HOU.SOC.LTD.B-WING ROOMNO.203,2 ND FLOOR OPL...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SUPRA CONSTRUCTION V/S CHANDRAKANT BHAMARIA
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate K R TRIVEDI
Respondant Advocate
ADDITIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMIN BLDG, THIRD FLOOR, NR CHETANA COLLAGE, BANDRA (E), MUMBAI 400051Execution Application No. EA/11/351. CHANDRAKANT BHAMARIA 16/4, TRILOK DARSHAN, 4TH KASTURBA ROAD, BORIVALI (E), MUMBAI 400066 ...........Ap...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
KHALID IRFAN KHAN V/S VIMACO CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV BELE
Respondant Advocate ADV PNDIT
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/08/631(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. VIMACO CONSTRUCTIONAMRAVATI BEFORE: Hon'ble...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SUDHIR RAMCHANDRA PHATAK V/S SHREE SAI CONSTRUCTION & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DILIP ANNASHAEB TAUR
Respondant Advocate M/S. BHAVE & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 391 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/10/2011 in Appeal No. 556/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE SAI CONSTRUCTION & ORS.109 Bharat Industrrial Estate, LBS marg Bhandup WestMumbai - 400...
Case Number: 391
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.