Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8231 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
OM CONSTRUCTION V/S MEDHAVI SNEHALKUMAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-04-2015
SHRI VIJAY MADANLAL LALPURIA V/S S M CONSTRUCTION & ORS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U B WAVIKAR
Respondant Advocate VIJAY KANORIA
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/531(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/03/2010 in Case No. 510/2004 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. S M CONSTRUCTION & ORSSHOP NO 2 LAKE VIEW APT OPP TO DENA BANKMAROL MUMBAI -59Ma...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MR. GURMEET SINGH DANG V/S M/S. TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S. K. TIWARI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/12/72(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/06/2012 in Case No. CC/164/2011 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. M/S. TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONTHROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY, MR. CHETAN K...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHRI RAMCHANDRA VISHWANATH GORHE V/S M/S JAY CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A PATWARDHAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/12/2(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/12/2011 in Case No. 16/08 of District Nashik)1. M/S JAY CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI MAHENDRA RAGHUNATH METKAR R/AT 10 VIRAG ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MR. GURMEET SINGH DANG V/S M/S. TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S. K. TIWARI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/12/3031. M/S. TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONTHROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY, MR. CHETAN KESHAVLAL BAVALIA 214, LAXMI PLAZA, NEW LINK ROAD, ANDHERI ( W ),MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MIDIA CONSTRUCTION V/S Mrs. Arwah Arjun Madan
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/3201. Mrs. Arwah Arjun MadanRow House No.4,Midea Park,BT Kawde RoadPune-1Maharashtra2. 2.Mr. Arjun Herbhagwandas MadanR/at. Row House No.4,Midia Park,B.T. Kawade RoadPune-411 001Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MIDIA CONSTRUCTIONVinayak Smruti...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Indian Overseas Bank V/S Puja Construction Co
Indian Overseas Bank Construction
Court Name: Rajkot
Appelant Advocate N B Upadhyay
Respondant Advocate N S Bhatt
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2020
Ashirwad Construction V/S Vinod Kumar Jain
Court Name: Jabalpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2016
Electro Audio Vision, V/S M/S Diddan Construction represented by Shri B.N.S.Didan
Court Name: East Khasi Hills
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. 61/20081. M/S Diddan Construction represented by Shri B.N.S.Didan Umpling, Shillong BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Sanjay Goyal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Dr C.Massar MEMBERHON'ABLE MR. D.R Thangkhiew...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
POONAM CONSTRUCTION V/S SUDHIR DESHPANDE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.