Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.K. VALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 11/03/2002 in Appeal No. 903-910/2001 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GADGIL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.FLAT NO .3 GAUTAM TERRACE LANE NO. 9, PRABHA...
Case Number: 3171
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.K. VALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 11/03/2002 in Appeal No. 903-910/2001 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GADGIL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.FLAT NO .3 GAUTAM TERRACE LANE NO. 9, PRABHA...
Case Number: 3170
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.K. VALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 11/03/2002 in Appeal No. 903-910/2001 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GADGIL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.FLAT NO .3 GAUTAM TERRACE LANE NO. 9, PRABHA...
Case Number: 3169
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.K. VALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 11/03/2002 in Appeal No. 903-910/2001 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GADGIL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.FLAT NO .3 GAUTAM TERRACE LANE NO. 9, PRABHA...
Case Number: 3168
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.K. VALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 11/03/2002 in Appeal No. 903-910/2001 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GADGIL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.FLAT NO .3 GAUTAM TERRACE LANE NO. 9, PRABHA...
Case Number: 3167
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.K. VALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 11/03/2002 in Appeal No. 903-910/2001 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GADGIL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.FLAT NO .3 GAUTAM TERRACE LANE NO. 9, PRABHA...
Case Number: 3166
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/645/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/03/2011 in Case No. 271/2010 of District Aurangabad)1. 1.Arvind Janardhan PanditR/O.Plot No.12.Vasundhara Colony,Bhavsingpura.Aura...
Case Number: 380
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. GOSWAMI
Respondant Advocate KAPIL KHER
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1215 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/02/2012 in Appeal No. 693/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHARADA VISWANATHAN MENONW/o Shri K.S Vishwanathan Menon, permanent R/o 301,Solitaire, Hiranandan...
Case Number: 1215
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. A. SUBHASHINI
Respondant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 441 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 29/06/2006 in Complaint No. 56/2003 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. DR. N. RANGANAYAKULU AND ANR.T F NO 6, 2-2-5 USHA KIRAR, ARCADE OSAMANIA UNIVERSITY ROAD, HYDERABA...
Case Number: 441
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2013
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.