company-name-logo

Construction

Latest Judgments

Total 8273 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.

Maharashtra

PARANJPE CONSTRUCTION CO & ORS V/S SOU KALPANA PRABHAKAR KAKIRDE & ORS

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S D PAITHANE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/09/551. SOU KALPANA PRABHAKAR KAKIRDE & ORS3 ARPANA MAHAL PARANJPE SCHEME A ROAD NO 2 VILEPARLE (E) MUMBAI 400057Maharastra2. Mrs.Pandurang Tatoji Chavhan, Dead,Legal Represe...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

PARANJPE CONSTRUCTION CO. V/S MR SHARAD KESHAV NANIVADEKAR & ORS

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S PAITHANE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/09/551. SOU KALPANA PRABHAKAR KAKIRDE & ORS3 ARPANA MAHAL PARANJPE SCHEME A ROAD NO 2 VILEPARLE (E) MUMBAI 400057Maharastra2. Mrs.Pandurang Tatoji Chavhan, Dead,Legal Represe...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Disha Regency 'C' Wing flat Owners V/S M/s Disha Construction

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A Kulkarni

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/12/3911. M/s Disha Construction 632/633, Shukrawar Peth SolapurSolapurMaharashtra 2. Mr. Kalyani Shankarao Birajdar632/633 Shukrawar peth SolapurSolapurMaharashtra...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 01-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Rudrani Construction Co. Through it's Authority Holder & Manager V/S The Deputy Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd.

Construction   Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A.S.Shelke

Respondant Advocate Amit Yadkikar

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/218/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/03/2012 in Case No. 325/2009 of District Latur )1. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Lt...

Case Number: 218

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/s.Lodha Healthy construction and Developers Private Limited, Shah and Nahar Industrial Estate,Dr. V/S Smt.Nisha Gupta, W/o.Sri Sunil K.Gupta,R/o.13,Bhavya's Alluri Meadows,

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr.Pavan Kumar Agarwal, Flat No.402, Plot No.38, Plasant Park Apartments,

Respondant Advocate M/s.D.Seshadri Naidu & Mr.M.Hari Babu

Complaint Case No. CC/59/20111. Smt.Nisha Gupta, W/o.Sri Sunil K.Gupta,R/o.13,Bhavya's Alluri Meadows,Hyderabad,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s.Lodha Healthy construction and Developers Private Limited, Shah and Nahar Industrial Estate,Dr.E.Moses Road, WorliMumbai, Rep.by.i...

Case Number: 59

|

Date of Filing: 31-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

M/s.Lodha Healthy construction and Developers Private Limited, Shah and Nahar Industrial Estate,Dr. V/S Smt.Nisha Gupta, W/o.Sri Sunil K.Gupta,R/o.13,Bhavya's Alluri Meadows,

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr.Pavan Kumar Agarwal, Flat No.402, Plot No.38, Plasant Park Apartments,

Respondant Advocate M/s.D.Seshadri Naidu & Mr.M.Hari Babu

Complaint Case No. CC/59/20111. Smt.Nisha Gupta, W/o.Sri Sunil K.Gupta,R/o.13,Bhavya's Alluri Meadows,Hyderabad,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s.Lodha Healthy construction and Developers Private Limited, Shah and Nahar Industrial Estate,Dr.E.Moses Road, WorliMumbai, Rep.by.i...

Case Number: 59

|

Date of Filing: 31-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Gruhalaxmi Construction and Land Developers, Through Prop. Suresh Kondbaji Burewar V/S Shri Parag Dadarao Raut

Construction  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. S.T. Sawal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/12/7521. Shri Parag Dadarao RautPlot No. 4, Mitra Nagar, Near Rashmi Gas Agency, Manewada,NagpurM.S............Complainant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

1.M/S.Tapadiya Construction Ltd. V/S 1. Sau.Janabai w/o.balkrushna Gawali,Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder,Adv.Prashant Balkrushna Kulkarni.

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rahul G.Joshi

Respondant Advocate

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.Revision Petition No. RP/4/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. 1. Sau.Janabai w/o.balkrushna Gawali,Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder,Adv.Prashant Balk...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

CONSUMER WELFARE ASSOCIATION V/S FALSA CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate L S SHUKLA

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/12/922(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/07/2012 in Case No. 617/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. FALSA CONSTRUCTIONTHROUGH THE OWENER PRAKASH T TANNA O/AT OPPOSITE MADHUBAN TEL...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

The Director, Lavlesh Construction Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mrs.Ellen Padmakar Kolhatkar, Through Mr.William F.Fernandes & Mrs.Cynthiya W.Fernandes, P/A Holder

Construction  

Court Name: Thane

Appelant Advocate A.B.Jahagirdar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM ,THANEComplaint Case No. CC/11/3671. Mrs.Ellen Padmakar Kolhatkar, Through Mr.William F.Fernandes & Mrs.Cynthiya W.Fernandes, P/A HolderFlat No.204, Anudham CHS, M.G.Road, Near Tam Talav, Vasai(w), Thane-421201............Complainant(s)V...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 08-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.