Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8232 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
1. M/S ADITYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA PRIVATE LTD., V/S ALOK CHORDIA, S/O MS. CHORDIA, AGED 44 YEARS,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S CH ANJANEYULU
Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix-Op1 &op2
Complaint Case No. CC/44/20121. ALOK CHORDIA, S/O MS. CHORDIA, AGED 44 YEARS,FLAT NO. 306, SANTOSH PLAZA, NAGARJUNA SAGAR ROAD, SAIDABAD, HYDERABAD............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/S ADITYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA PRIVATE LTD., FILM NAGAR, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD.2. 2. ...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. M/S ADITYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA PRIVATE LTD., V/S ALOK CHORDIA, S/O MS. CHORDIA, AGED 44 YEARS,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S CH ANJANEYULU
Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix-Op1 &op2
Complaint Case No. CC/44/20121. ALOK CHORDIA, S/O MS. CHORDIA, AGED 44 YEARS,FLAT NO. 306, SANTOSH PLAZA, NAGARJUNA SAGAR ROAD, SAIDABAD, HYDERABAD............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/S ADITYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA PRIVATE LTD., FILM NAGAR, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD.2. 2. ...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shri Vishwas Gaikwad (Deceased) V/S M/s G. P. Construction
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ujwala Sawant
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/13/5(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/06/2012 in Case No. CC/05/355 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. M/s G. P. ConstructionSurvey No2/1/1, Dhankawadi Tal Haweli, Pune 43Pun...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MALAD DIPTI APT. CHS LTD. V/S M/S. GARIBA CONSTRUCTION CO.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHILESH R. ADV.
Respondant Advocate Mr. S. Pattajoshi Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3303 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 21/06/2008 in Appeal No. 537/2008 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. GARIBA CONSTRUCTION CO.13,Ashmuko Building 395/97, Narsi Natha StreetMumbai-400003Mahar...
Case Number: 3303
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2013
DR RAM PANDURANG KULKARNI V/S DADHE CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ALMT LEGAL
Respondant Advocate Mr.D.S. Pagare
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/565(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/12/2011 in Case No. 180/2008 of District Pune)1. DADHE CONSTRUCTION PVT LTDTHROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR VIJAY NARAYAN DADHE OFF /ADD 438/...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. PRANJPE CONSTRUCTION CO. V/S ARVIND BABANRAO JADHAV.
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate ADV.MRS. TAJAL CHAVAN
Respondant Advocate
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S Om Shree Sainath Construction Co. V/S Pandrinath Karbhari Wavikar
Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane
Appelant Advocate Pranil Gaikwad
Respondant Advocate -
ADDITIONAL THANE DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUMRoom no. 428 and 429, Kokan Bhavan Annex Building, 4th floor,C.B.D, Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614.Execution Application No. EA/10/301. Pandrinath Karbhari WavikarA-603,Devival Tower opp. kolesewadi police station Kalyan (E)...........
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOCHIN STAR CONSTRUCTION V/S EDINA SUKUMARAN
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate R.MURALEEDHARAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/2341. EDINA SUKUMARAN RETIRED DOCTOR, W/O U.P.SUKUMARAN, RESIDING AT PUTHENPURAKAL HOUSE, CHERUKUSUMALAYAM, AZHEEKKALP.O., KOCHI-682 510ERNAKULAMKERALA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MANAGING DIRE...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Action Construction New Delhi V/S Shri Jitendra Chandrakant Wadgaonkar
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/681. Shri Jitendra Chandrakant WadgaonkarPunePuneMaharashtra ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Action Construction New Delhi New DelhiDelhiDelhi2. 2.Efficient salesPimpriPuneMaharashtra3. 3. I CI CI Lombard Insurance CoPimpri PuneMaharashtra4. 4.Senchu...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Manik Das, LMBIG Construction V/S Dr. Subhasish Chattopadhyay
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/13/55( Date of Filing : 08 May 2013 )InComplaint Case No. CC/10/421. Dr. Subhasish Chattopadhyay93A, Paharpur Roa...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.