company-name-logo

Construction

Latest Judgments

Total 8232 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.

Circuit Bench Nagpur

1. MALTI CONSTRUCTION V/S 1. SHEKHAR A.GUNDAWAR

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

1. MALTI CONSTRUCTION V/S 1. SUNIL SIDARSHANRAP SUBHEDAR

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 12-04-2016

Circuit Bench Nagpur

1. MALTI CONSTRUCTION V/S J.S.PRAKASH RAO

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

1. M/S. MALTI CONSTRUCTION V/S MR. MALAVARAPPU PARTHSARTHI

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SMT A.V.DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1. M/s. Aditya Construction Company India (P) Ltd., Chandralok Complwx, Plot No.A/12, Road No.2, Fil V/S Ch. Venkata Seshagiri Rao, Son of Sri Ch. Gandhi,Aged 37 Yrs, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.105, Green Park Residency Apartment, Behind B.K.Guda Park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad.

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Manne Hari Babu

Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix

CC NO. 135 Of 20121. Ch. Venkata Seshagiri Rao, Son of Sri Ch. Gandhi,Aged 37 Yrs, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.105, Green Park Residency Apartment, Behind B.K.Guda Park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Aditya Construction Company India (P) L...

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1. M/s. Aditya Construction Company India (P) Ltd., Chandralok Complwx, Plot No.A/12, Road No.2, Fil V/S Ch. Venkata Seshagiri Rao, Son of Sri Ch. Gandhi,Aged 37 Yrs, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.105, Green Park Residency Apartment, Behind B.K.Guda Park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad.

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Manne Hari Babu

Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix

CC NO. 135 Of 20121. Ch. Venkata Seshagiri Rao, Son of Sri Ch. Gandhi,Aged 37 Yrs, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.105, Green Park Residency Apartment, Behind B.K.Guda Park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Aditya Construction Company India (P) L...

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

DEEPAK NAGINDAS LOHAR & ANR. V/S M/S. SAI CONSTRUCTION & ANR.

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. JAYASHREE S. KULKARNI & MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 719 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/09/2012 in Appeal No. 977/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/1313/2013,IA/5147/20131. M/S. SAI CONSTRUCTION & ANR.R/AT NEAR S.NO-1/2 PLOT NO- 27.28...

Case Number: 719

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-09-2013

NCDRC

DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED V/S RUDRANEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Construction   Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company   Electricity  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT YADKIKAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2336 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/03/2013 in Appeal No. 218/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/3885/20131. RUDRANEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYGOVERMENT COLONY, LATUR, THROUGH ITS AUTHORI...

Case Number: 2336

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 14-10-2013

West Bengal

Mahaveer Construction (Puja Complex) V/S Sri Prabir Kumar Maity

Construction  

Court Name: Paschim Midnapore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPASCHIM MEDINIPUR. Complaint case No. 113/2013 BEFORE : THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT : Mr. Sujit Kumar Das. MEMBER : Mrs. Debi Sengupta. MEMBER : Mr. Kapot Chattopadhyay....

Case Number: 113

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-12-2017

NCDRC

M/s ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & 3 ORS., V/S Shri KIRAN KUMAR SETH & ANR.,

Construction   Ansal Housing  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S. D. SUDHI, MR. S. K. MISHRA & MR. RAKESH RAUSHAN,

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 293 OF 20131. Shri KIRAN KUMAR SETH & ANR.,J-3, Flat No. 201, Parasvnath Prestige, Sector-93A,NOIDA............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & 3 ORS.,UGF, Indraprakash, 21, B...

Case Number: 293

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.