Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT A.V.DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Manne Hari Babu
Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix
CC NO. 135 Of 20121. Ch. Venkata Seshagiri Rao, Son of Sri Ch. Gandhi,Aged 37 Yrs, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.105, Green Park Residency Apartment, Behind B.K.Guda Park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Aditya Construction Company India (P) L...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Manne Hari Babu
Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix
CC NO. 135 Of 20121. Ch. Venkata Seshagiri Rao, Son of Sri Ch. Gandhi,Aged 37 Yrs, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.105, Green Park Residency Apartment, Behind B.K.Guda Park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Aditya Construction Company India (P) L...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. JAYASHREE S. KULKARNI & MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 719 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/09/2012 in Appeal No. 977/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/1313/2013,IA/5147/20131. M/S. SAI CONSTRUCTION & ANR.R/AT NEAR S.NO-1/2 PLOT NO- 27.28...
Case Number: 719
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2013
Construction Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Electricity
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT YADKIKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2336 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/03/2013 in Appeal No. 218/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/3885/20131. RUDRANEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYGOVERMENT COLONY, LATUR, THROUGH ITS AUTHORI...
Case Number: 2336
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2013
Court Name: Paschim Midnapore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPASCHIM MEDINIPUR. Complaint case No. 113/2013 BEFORE : THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT : Mr. Sujit Kumar Das. MEMBER : Mrs. Debi Sengupta. MEMBER : Mr. Kapot Chattopadhyay....
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. D. SUDHI, MR. S. K. MISHRA & MR. RAKESH RAUSHAN,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 293 OF 20131. Shri KIRAN KUMAR SETH & ANR.,J-3, Flat No. 201, Parasvnath Prestige, Sector-93A,NOIDA............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & 3 ORS.,UGF, Indraprakash, 21, B...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.