Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Nitin Kamble & asso.
Respondant Advocate Kiran G. Ganjkar
Complaint Case No. CC/09/5921. Umakant S. Satamyash Apartment Opp kakade terrace S. No. 43, Warje ,Pune...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Yash ConstructionS.No. 125, Warje Jakat Naka. Haveli,Pune............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MS. Geeta S...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate SHAILESH SHUKLA
Respondant Advocate Dipesh U. Siroya
Complaint Case No. 144/20051. rajesh r. dikshit6/4 NAVSHAKTI CHSL. NEHRU NGR. KANJURMARG EASTMUMBAI 42MAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. rockline constructionRAJABHADUR MANSION 26 FORTMUMBAI 23MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.K. KANTAWALA, MR. SATYENDER CHAHAR & MS. RITIKA GODHWANI
Respondant Advocate MR. KISHORE RAWAT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 635 OF 2013 IN RP/203/20071. ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUDHANSU BIHARI LAL GOUR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...
Case Number: 635
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A V Patwardhan
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/13/80(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/07/2013 in Case No. 109/2008 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. M/s Mahavir Construction Co124 Bora Bazar Street, Shop No 2, Fort Mumbai 40...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. CH.Anjaneyulu
Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix-Op1 &Op2
First Appeal No. CC/2012/86(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. Alok Choudia S/o.M.S. Chordia Aged 44 years, Occ:Pvt. Employee,Flat No.306, Santhosh Plaza, Nagarjuna Sagar Road, IS Sadan, Saidabad, Hyderabad-500059............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate RAJAN BADLE
Respondant Advocate
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. CH.Anjaneyulu
Respondant Advocate M/s. Legal Matrix-Op1 &Op2
First Appeal No. CC/2012/86(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. Alok Choudia S/o.M.S. Chordia Aged 44 years, Occ:Pvt. Employee,Flat No.306, Santhosh Plaza, Nagarjuna Sagar Road, IS Sadan, Saidabad, Hyderabad-500059............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. FA/13/290(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. SAHINI TRUST768, CHABI GANJ, KASHMERE GATE, DELHI-110006...........Appellant(s)Versus1. AN...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri Abbad H.H. Ponda
Respondant Advocate Shri P.M. Shah
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/614(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/06/2010 in Case No. 14/2008 of District DCF, South Mumbai)1. M/S GARIBA CONSTRUCTION COThro Shri. Bimal Gariba, 807, HIMALAYA SOCIETY, JUHU L...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT.A.V.DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate MR.BHAVE
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/581(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2007 in Case No. CC/06/190 of District Nagpur)1. ARUN K.HIRULKARNAGPURNAGP...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.