Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8232 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
M/s.Kolbaswami Construction Co.,through M.V. Katole V/S Arjun Ukandrao Naik
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Khare
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/12/73(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/108 to134/09 of District Nagpur)1. A. Ahmad KhanR/o. Plot No....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s.Kolbaswami Construction Co.,through M.V. Katole V/S Prakash Ganpatrao Dhobale
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Khare
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/12/73(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/108 to134/09 of District Nagpur)1. A. Ahmad KhanR/o. Plot No....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s.Kolbaswami Construction Co.,through M.V. Katole V/S A. Ahmad Khan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Khare
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/12/73(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/108 to134/09 of District Nagpur)1. A. Ahmad KhanR/o. Plot No....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Kolbaswami Construction Co ltd V/S Sardarsing Ratansing Aswal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Khare
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/10/565(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. cc/108/2009 of District None)1. Sardarsing Ratansing AswalNagpu...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. SABITA CONSTRUCTION & OTHERS. V/S ASISH KUMAR DUTTA
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate PRASANTA BANERJEE
Respondant Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/333/2010 1. ASISH KUMAR DUTTAD/32/11,BAISHAKHI ABASON,BLOCKAG-SECTOR-II,SALT LAKE CITY,KOLKATA-700091. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M/S. SABITA CONSTRUCTION & OTHERS.OS/22,MOGHAL BAGAN RAILWAY Q...
Case Number: 333
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s. Lodha Healthy Construction & Developers Pvt Ltd., Regd. Office: 216, Shah & Nahar Industrial Es V/S 1. Mrs. C. Sita Prasad Aged 53 years, W/o. C. Venkateshwara Prasad,Plot No.19, Huda Heights, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. C.V. Narasimham
Respondant Advocate Mr. A. Venkatesh
CC NO. 107 Of 20121. 1. Mrs. C. Sita Prasad Aged 53 years, W/o. C. Venkateshwara Prasad,Plot No.19, Huda Heights, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034.2. C. Venkattshwara Prasad, Aged 53 years, Both residents of Plot no.19, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034.....
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Telco Construction Equipment Co. Ltd. V/S Machineni Mohan Rao S/o Siddaiah Naidu, agriculturist, aged 35 yrs.,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.P.Venkateshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. Lotus Law Association OP2
Complaint Case No. cc/87/20121. Machineni Mohan Rao S/o Siddaiah Naidu, agriculturist, aged 35 yrs.,Ho.No.5-438,Ankamma Nagar,Railway Kodur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Telco Construction Equipment Co. Ltd.24-11-144,Warwick House, Shanthi nagar2. M/s Tata Capital Ltd., Rep. b...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sri c.A. Ved Prakash, S/o. C.J. Amarnath Rao, Aged about 45 Years, M/s. Krupa Anand Construction Com V/S S. Chennaiah S/o. Late Yellaiah, Aged about 63 Years, Prof: retired Govt. Employee, H.No.FI.No.C1-F 1/A, Krupa Apartment, West Maredpally, Secunderabad-500 026.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. S. Chennaiah (P I P)
Respondant Advocate Mr.T.Srinivasa Reddy
FA No: 496 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/06/2013 in Case No. CC/1183/2010 of District Hyderabad-III)1. S. Chennaiah S/o. Late Yellaiah, Aged about 63 Years, Prof: retired Govt. Employee, H.No.FI.No.C1-F 1/A, Krupa Apartment, West Maredpally, Secunderabad-500 026..............
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s. Lodha Healthy Construction & Developers Pvt Ltd., Regd. Office: 216, Shah & Nahar Industrial Es V/S 1. Mrs. C. Sita Prasad Aged 53 years, W/o. C. Venkateshwara Prasad,Plot No.19, Huda Heights, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. C.V. Narasimham
Respondant Advocate Mr. A. Venkatesh
CC NO. 107 Of 20121. 1. Mrs. C. Sita Prasad Aged 53 years, W/o. C. Venkateshwara Prasad,Plot No.19, Huda Heights, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034.2. C. Venkattshwara Prasad, Aged 53 years, Both residents of Plot no.19, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034.....
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1.Sankalp Construction Through its Partner Shri Prabhakar Pandurang Bhosale and other V/S Shri.Shrikant Vasant Chopade
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate Adv. Dnyanaraj G. Sant
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/13/281. Shri.Shrikant Vasant ChopadeR/at. 202, Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Hsg. Society, Yerawada, Pune-411 006.PuneMaharashtra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.Sankalp Construction Through its Partner Shri Prabhakar Pandurang Bhosale and otherOffice at: 82...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.