Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. POONAM MAKHIJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2583
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. POONAM MAKHIJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2582
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. POONAM MAKHIJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2581
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. POONAM MAKHIJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2449
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PONAM MAKHIJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2448
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. POONAM MAKHIJANI MOHD WASAY KHAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2447
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS.POONAM MAKHIJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2259 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 30/01/2008 in Appeal No. 268/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHREE CONSTRUCTIONSonapur, LBS Marg,MumbaiMumbai - 400 012...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 2259
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate Thorat
Respondant Advocate Inamdar
Complaint Case No. cc/10/471. Umda Plaza hosing societyC/o Mr. jamil seikh , AT+Po-Barovo,Khadak Islampura, Gram Panchayat,Tal- junnar, Pune...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Rahil construction and othersRehmat Plaza building , flat-8,shipae mohaala,Junnar , Pune............Opp.Pa...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.Y. DESHMUKH
Respondant Advocate MR. DNYANARAJ G. SANT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3003 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/04/2013 in Appeal No. 162/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/5171/2013,IA/5172/20131. M/S. SANKALP CONSTRUCTION & ANR.THROUGH, 1. SHRI PRABHAKAR P...
Case Number: 3004
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.Y. DESHMUKH
Respondant Advocate MR. DNYANARAJ G. SANT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3003 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/04/2013 in Appeal No. 162/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/5171/2013,IA/5172/20131. M/S. SANKALP CONSTRUCTION & ANR.THROUGH, 1. SHRI PRABHAKAR P...
Case Number: 3003
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.