company-name-logo

Construction

Latest Judgments

Total 8232 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.

NCDRC

ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LIMITED & ANR. V/S FORTUNE ARCADE ALLOTEES/ TRADERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.)

Construction   Ansal Housing  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJINDER DHAR & R L SYNGAL

Respondant Advocate MR. TAPAN KUMAR JHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 29 OF 20061. "FORTUNE ARCADE" ALLOTEES/ TRADERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.)THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI LOK CHAND, MZ 19, "ANSALS FORTUNE ARCADE" K-BLOCK, SECTOR 18, NOIDA - 201 301 (GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR)UTTAR PRADESH...

Case Number: 29

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2006

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2014

West Bengal

M/S. R.S. CONSTRUCTION V/S PULAK KR. GHOSH

Construction  

Court Name: Hooghly

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 98

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2022

Maharashtra

LOK HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION V/S RATNAKAR OJHA

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR. M.S.PRASAD

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/01/1551. RATNAKAR OJHA201,Ganpati Apartment,Virat Nagar,VIRAR(W) ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. LOK HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTIONLok Chambers,Marol Maroshi Road,Marol,Andheri (...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2001

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

TATA MOTORS V/S BALAJI TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION

Tata Motors   Construction   Tata  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 174

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2019

NCDRC

PURUSHOTTAM V/S THE CHAIRMAN, VIDARBHA HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WORK ASSOCIATION

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M. R. KHAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3605 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/12/2012 in Appeal No. 1505/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/6410/20131. THE CHAIRMAN, VIDARBHA HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WORK ASSOCIATIONMAA SANTOSHI...

Case Number: 3606

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2014

NCDRC

ANAND NARAYANRAO LIMJE V/S THE CHAIRMAN, VIDARBHA HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WORK ASSOCIATION

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M. R. KHAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3605 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/12/2012 in Appeal No. 1505/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/6410/20131. THE CHAIRMAN, VIDARBHA HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WORK ASSOCIATIONMAA SANTOSHI...

Case Number: 3605

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2014

Circuit Bench Nagpur

ANANDRAO TANBAJI JAGTAB V/S GODSON PLOTS& CONSTRUCTION THROUGH PARTNERS (1) ARVIND G.JIRAPURE (2) PRAKASH G.JIRAPURE

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A. DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate V.D. DARNE

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/08/440(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/09/2007 in Case No. CC/07/222 of District State Commission)1. GODSON PLOTS& CONSTRUCTION THROUGH PARTNERS (1) ARVIND G.JIRAPURE (2) PRAKASH G.J...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 14-05-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Suresh Kahdbaji Burewar Gruhlaxmi Construction V/S Poonam Vinod Khushalani

Construction  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Sachin Mishrikotkar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/14/2551. Poonam Vinod Khushalani Nagpur Nagpur Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Suresh Kahdbaji Burewar Gruhlaxmi Constru...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHRI. OGANNA D. DEVENPALLI V/S M/S RAGHAVENDRA CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.G.MAGNUR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/14/62InFirst Appeal No. A/14/1591. M/S RAGHAVENDRA CONSTRUCTIONR/o. 21/43, Raghavendra Apartment, New Pachha Peth, SolapurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

NAROTTAMBHAI GANESHBHAI PATEL & ORS. V/S POOJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ORS.

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. BRAJ K. MISHRA & MR. R.G. MODI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 110-113 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/01/2014 in Complaint No. 163/2002, 164/2002, 165/2002...etc of the State Commission Gujarat)1. POOJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ORS.A Partnership firm, Address:-243/24...

Case Number: 110

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.