Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8274 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
AGRAWAL CONSTRUCTION V/S UMA GUPTA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH.MANISH CHOUHAN
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2022
Sri Rabi Shankar Sashmal, C/o.- M/s Sree Sree Lokenath Baba Construction V/S Mrs. Geeta Gomes, W/o. Sebastian Gomes
Court Name: Rajarhat
Appelant Advocate Sri Abhijit Chakraborty
Respondant Advocate
Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd FloorPremises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161Complaint Case No. CC/557/2022( Date of Filing : 28 Sep 2022 )1. Mr...
Case Number: 557
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2022
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2022
M/s A-Pundir Construction V/S M/s Stona Tyles
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rohit Srivastava
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHANDDEHRADUNREVISION PETITION NO. 25 / 2022M/s Stona Tiles through its ProprietorSh. Manoj Agarwal S/o late Sh. N.P. AgarwalR/o 147/2, Sahastradhara Road, Dehradun…… RevisionistVersusM/s A-Pundir Construction throu...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2022
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2022
1.M/s Aditya Construction Company Ltd V/S Sri Kalepu Prabhakar
Court Name: Hyderabad
Appelant Advocate M. Krishna Chaitanya
Respondant Advocate B. Bharat Reddy
Case Number: 601
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2023
1. M/s Aditya Construction Company India Private Limited V/S 1. Ujvala Sanjay Sapkal
Court Name: Hyderabad
Appelant Advocate Satish Kumar Kuna
Respondant Advocate BBR Legal
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2021
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2023
M/S. ANSALHOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LIMITED V/S PRAMOD KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S. INTELLETIVE LAW OFFICE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 757 OF 20181. PRAMOD KUMARS/O SH. PRATAP CHAND R/O 4/4, KALKAJI EXTN., NEHRU ENCLAVE,NEW DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. ANSALHOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE...
Case Number: 757
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2022
ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR. V/S SHILPA DULANI & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL & MR. SAHIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2009 OF 20191. SHILPA DULANI & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR. 2. SAMYAK PROJECTS PVT.LTD.111,1st Floor, Antriksh Bhawan,Kasturbha Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-1100...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2022
ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT V/S BRIJ KISHORE VERMA
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2021
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2022
Shree Sidhivinayak Classic Construction Pvt. ltd. V/S Punit Kumar Jain
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Adv. Satish L. Prabhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012 Phone No. 022-2417 1360Website- www.confonet.nic.inMiscellaneous Application No. MA/22/10( Date of Filing : 28 Jun 2...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2022
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2022
Ms Sai Construction Company, Through Prop. Shri Vishnu Yashwant Undale V/S Mr. K V Gopalkrishnan
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate Adv Jayanti Naik Prasanna
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.