Coffee
Latest Judgments
Total 268 Consumer Court Cases Against Coffee.
Executive Engineer, MESCOM., and another V/S R. Iqbal Ahamad S/o P. Abdul Ravoof, Coffee Planter,HIrekolale Road,Uppalli,Chikmagalur Taluk
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate Gerald Dias
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Forum,Hosmane Extension, Near IB, Chikmagalur-577 101CAUSELISTComplaint Case No. CC/7/20161. R. Iqbal Ahamad S/o P. Abdul Ravoof, Coffee Planter,HIrekolale Road,Uppalli,Chikmagalur TalukChikmagalur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, MESCOM., an...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2017
AMALGAMATED BEAN COFFEE V/S NARENDER YADEV
Court Name: Jaipur-III
Appelant Advocate SUNIL KUMAR
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 345
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2017
Manish Mishra V/S Coffee Day Global Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Jyoti Mukherjee
Respondant Advocate Ms. Tanusree Dhar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/536/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/04/2016 in Case No. CC/449/2014 of District Kolkata-I(North))1. Coffee Day Global Ltd.Head office at Vittal Mallya Road, Benga...
Case Number: 536
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
Principle, Amber Valley Residential School, Chikmagalur V/S Sudhir Kumar P. R/o Radeya Behind Coffee Day, Chikmagalur
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate M.R. Yathiraj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Forum,Hosmane Extension, Near IB, Chikmagalur-577 101CAUSELISTComplaint Case No. CC/74/20161. Sudhir Kumar P. R/o Radeya Behind Coffee Day, ChikmagalurChikmagalur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Principle, Amber Valley Residential School, ChikmagalurChikmagalur...
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
M/s. Amalgamated Bean Coffee V/S M/S.T.V. Anandakrishna
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate K.P. Thrimurthy
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2017
K A JOSE V/S DEPUTY DIRECTOR COFFEE BOARD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NOs.526/15, 527/15, 755/15 & 756/15JUDGMENT DATED:30.11.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERAPPEAL NO.526/15K.A. Jose, S/o Antony,Kavalakattu (...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2016
The General Manager, B.S.N.L., Chikmagalur, And Others V/S Ramakrishna Shetty, Coffee Planter, R/o Malligekhan Estate, Jenugadde Post, Chikmagalur
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate D.L. Ramanujachar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Forum,Hosmane Extension, Near IB, Chikmagalur-577 101CAUSELISTComplaint Case No. CC/120/20151. Ramakrishna Shetty, Coffee Planter, R/o Malligekhan Estate, Jenugadde Post, ChikmagalurChikmahalur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The General Manager, B.S.N.L., Chik...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
K A ROY V/S DEPUTY DIRECTOR COFFEE BOARD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NOs.526/15, 527/15, 755/15 & 756/15JUDGMENT DATED:30.11.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERAPPEAL NO.526/15K.A. Jose, S/o Antony,Kavalakattu (...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2016
K M JOSEPH V/S THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COFFEE BOARD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S MENON AND PAI
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMI.A.682/16 IN APPEAL NO.351/16ORDER DATED:18.07.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTThe Deputy Director (Development),Cofee Board, Kalpetta. : PETITIONER(By Adv: Sri. V.K. Mohan...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2016
Vishal Gargi V/S Coffee Day Global
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bipin Kalppa
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Coffee in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Coffee ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Coffee under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.