Clinic
Latest Judgments
Total 765 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.
M/s. Kaya Skin Clinic V/S Smt. Sulagna Mallick
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Unit-I, Kolkatahttp://confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/11/3341. Smt. Sulagna Mallick3B, Rammohan Mallick Garden Road, Kolkata-700010.KolkataWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Kaya Skin ClinicKaya Ltd., Aashiana, 69A, Purna Das Road, Kol...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s LAPTOP CLINIC V/S RAJEESH.K.V
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/250/20131. RAJEESH.K.VKINATTUKARA VALAPPIL HOUSE AYANKALAM(PO) THAVANOOR-679573MALAPPURAM DIST...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s LAPTOP CLINICBUILDING No.2/2368A-G Near GANDHI ASHRAM CIVIL STATION(PO) 673020KOZHIKODE............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURA...
Case Number: 250
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
AMRITSAR EYS CLINIC &OTHERS V/S SH. AJAY GAUTAM
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate M/S. J.R. MIDHA & CO. & DR. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 649 OF 2013 IN FA/428/20041. SH. AJAY GAUTAM...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AMRITSAR EYS CLINIC &OTHERS...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS...
Case Number: 649
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
NEERAJ CLINIC PVT. LTD. V/S MANJEET KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AMITA GUPTA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 608 OF 2013 IN FA/626/20121. MANJEET KUMAR SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NEERAJ CLINIC PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE ...
Case Number: 608
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2013
DIRECTOR, SURYA CLINIC & ANR. V/S MEENA SAHU
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.B. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1138 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 01/02/2013 in Appeal No. 1436/2012 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MEENA SAHUW/O MR PRAKASH SAHU, R/O HOUSE NO.206, BIJLI COLONY, ANAND NAGAR,BHOPALM.P......
Case Number: 1138
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2013
Master Harjot Singh, Minor Thorugh his father and Natural guardian Jagmohan Singh V/S Dr. Batra's Positive Health Clinic Pvt.Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashwani Talwar, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Khunger, Adv. for the respondent
First Appeal No. FA/217/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Dr. Batra's Positive Health Clinic Pvt.Ltd.SCO No. 45-46, Sector-8/C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh now at present SCO No. 16-17, Ground Floor, Sector-9/D Madhya Marg, Chandigarh through its authori...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Managing Director, Shrikrishna Heart Clinic and Critical Care Center V/S Rahandamal Haraldas Chelwani
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Mohd. Ateeque
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/6021. Rahandamal Haraldas ChelwaniGanesh Ward, Pusad,Yawatmal 445204Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Managing Direct...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NEERAJ CLINIC PVT. LTD. V/S MANJEET KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AMITA GUPTA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 626 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Complaint No. 59/1997 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MANJEET KUMAR SHARMAS/o. Sh.Dhani Ram Sharma, House No. 302, Sector-17, Panchkula,HARYANA.............
Case Number: 626
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2013
Proprieterix Smt K Sarada, Delma Eye Clinic V/S Iqbal
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/12/89InComplaint Case No. CC/12/1081. IqbalKamaleswaram, Manacaud...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Proprieterix Smt K Sarada, Delma Eye ClinicManacaud, TVM...........Resp...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DENTAL CARE CLINIC & ANR. V/S RAJWINDER KAUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGION OF LAWYERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 337 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/07/2011 in Appeal No. 59/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. RAJWINDER KAURGouse No-25, sector-18-A ChandigarhChandigarh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DE...
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.