Clinic
Latest Judgments
Total 765 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.
Sharma Clinic & Ors V/S Jaspal Singh
Court Name: Rupnagar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pardeep Sahai, Adv
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTT. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ROPAR Consumer Complaint No. : 140 of 05.11.2014 Date of decision : 13.03.2015 Jaspal Singh, aged about 60 years, son of Shamsher Singh son of Joginder Singh, resident of Village Marauli Kalan,Tehsil Chamkaur Sahib, District ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2015
Alankar Sliming & Cosmetic Clinic Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar Dhandhania
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Arup Paul
Respondant Advocate Ms. Monima Khan
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/223/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/08/2012 in Case No. CC/368/2010 of District Kolkata-II)1. Ashok Kumar DhandhaniaS/o Late Jugal Kishore Dhandhania, Dhandhania...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2015
Ankita Khanna V/S Dheer Dental Clinic & Ors.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHRevision Petition No.06 of 2015Date of Institution09.03.2015Date of Decision12.03.2015Dheer Dental Clinic, SCO No.358, First Floor, Sector 44-D, Chandigarh.Dr. Dhavneet Singh Dheer, Dental Surgeon & Consul...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2015
Ashish Kumar V/S Singla Neurology Clinic
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashwani Talwar
Respondant Advocate Rohit Kumar, Vaibhav Narang
2nd Additional BenchPUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. 260 of 2012 Date of institution: 05.03.2012 Date of decision : 24 .02.2015Singla Neurology Clinic through its proprietor, Dr. Gaurav Singla, Bhatti ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2015
Jivan Jyoti Clinic & Hospital V/S Master Rounaq Sharma
Court Name: North East
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM: NORTH-EASTGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHID.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, NAND NAGRI, DELHI-93Complaint Case No.379/10CORAM: Hon’ble President Sh. N.K. Goel Hon’ble Member Sh. Nishat Ahmad AlviIn the matter of:Master Rounaq Sharma (minor)S/o Shr...
Case Number: 379
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2015
RUBY HALL CLINIC V/S MR. GAJANAN R. GOVARIKAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/02/1801. MR. GAJANAN R. GOVARIKARPUNE............Complainant(s)Versus1. RUBY HALL CLINICPUNE.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shashikant A. Kulkarni PRESIDING MEMB...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Clinic In Charge the Mission Hospital and others V/S Tatini Kundu
Court Name: Bankura
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Jayanta Kr. Mukgarjee
Case Number: 141
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2015
Dr. Tapan Kr. Maitra C/o. Orthopedic Clinic V/S Mita Das W/o. Rabi Das
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 686
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2015
SHEELA MATERNITY HOSPITAL & FRACTURE CLINIC & ANR. V/S THAVARMAL (DECEASED) & 6 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BHARAT SWAROOP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. VIZZY AGARWAL & MR. J.P. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3887 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1578/2007&1596/2007 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. THAVARMAL (DECEASED) & 6 ORS.S/o Sitaram R/o The Mohalla of Chaukidar Ward No-25,F...
Case Number: 3887
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2015
Dr. Dhanesh Ratan Varma, Dr. Shivratan Lal Memorial dental Clinic V/S Ku. Richa Sahu
Court Name: Rewa
Appelant Advocate Bhaskar Singh Parihar
Respondant Advocate Kaamteshvar Singh
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.