company-name-logo

Clinic

Latest Judgments

Total 765 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.

Haryana

Dr. Batras Positive Health Clinic Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vijender Singh

Clinic  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Ishwar Dahiya

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Execution Petition No. EA/186 of 2016 INSTITUTED ON : 16.11.2016 DATE OF ORDER : 07.04.2017 Vijender Singh S/o Sh. Sahib Singh, R/o H.No. 768, Sector 23, Sonepat.…..ComplainantVersusDr. Batra Positive Health ...

Case Number: 186

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 11-04-2017

Gujarat

RIDISKVAR CLINIC PVT.LTD. V/S HIREN R.SHAH

Clinic  

Court Name: Surat

Appelant Advocate R.K.BUNDIWALA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2017

NCDRC

M/S. RASI CLINIC & 3 ORS. V/S S. SARAVANAN

Clinic  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S. VALLINAYAGAM

Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. RAJAT SEHGAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2159 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 23/01/2014 in Appeal No. 227/2012 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. S. SARAVANANNO-1 ALAGAR STREET , SENTHANEERPURAM, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI -620004TAMIL NADU............

Case Number: 2159

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 23-03-2017

Gujarat

GEETABEN SUNILKUMAR BARMAN & OTHERS V/S SNEHAL CLINIC & OTHERS

Clinic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate MILAN DUDHIYA

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2017

Punjab

Sidhu Dental Clinic V/S Jagdeep Singh

Clinic   Dental  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri G.S.Chatha

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/570/20161. Jagdeep SinghJagdeep Singh (Jaggi) son of Sh. Bansi Lal, resisdent of Ward No. 10, Himmatpura Mohalla, Dhuri, Tehsil Dhuri, Distt. Sangrur....

Case Number: 570

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2017

Maharashtra

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2017

Karnataka

Vijay Poly Clinic & Diagnostic Center, Raichur V/S Sonali W/o. Wilson, Raichur

Clinic  

Court Name: Raichur

Appelant Advocate Sri. C.Kesavarao

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2017

Maharashtra

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Through Div. Manager V/S M/s. Khemuka X-ray And Ultra Sound Clinic

The New India Assurance   New India Assurance   Clinic  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. Kaushik Mandal

Respondant Advocate Adv.S.M.Paldhikar

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNew Administrative Building No.-13rd Floor, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440001Ph.0712-2546884Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/11/2151. M/s. Khemuka X-ray And Ultra Sound ClinicVinayak Apartment, Dhantoli,NagpurMaharashtra...........Com...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 10-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 03-02-2017

Karnataka

Director Naryana Harudralaya Super Speciality Clinic and Diagnostic Centre, V/S Deepak S/o. Late Ghanashyamdas Kori Aged 32 years

Clinic  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Rahul Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Before the 4th Addl District consumer forum, 1st Floor, B.M.T.C, B-Block, T.T.M.C, Building, K.H. Road, Shantinagar, Bengaluru - 560027J.N. Havanur, PresidentComplaint Case No. CC/11/7761. Deepak S/o. Late Ghanashyamdas Kori Aged 32 yearsSantosh Bhawan, Mannu Chowk, Teekrapara, B...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2017

Karnataka

The Proprietor, Authorized dealer for Samsung Sales, Mobile Clinic V/S Ankita Raju Kamble

Samsung   Clinic   Mobile  

Court Name: Uttara Kannda

Appelant Advocate Sri. G.V.Naik and Sri. V.A. Todurkar

Respondant Advocate R.V Bhat

Case Number: 57

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.