company-name-logo

Clinic

Latest Judgments

Total 765 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.

Haryana

Varun Clinic V/S Piyus

Clinic  

Court Name: Kurukshetra

Appelant Advocate S.P.Sharma

Respondant Advocate Ashok Goel

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KURUKSHETRA.Consumer Complaint No.126 OF 2015Date of Instt.:10.06.2015Date of Decision:26.02.20211.Piyush aged about 7 years (minor) son of Sh.Rinku.2.Lattika aged about 11 months(minor) d/o Sh.Rinku, adopted daughter of ...

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2021

Kerala

Ramtech Laptop Clinic V/S Mr.Jisho James

Clinic   Laptop  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKANNURComplaint Case No. CC/81/2019( Date of Filing : 16 Apr 2019 )1. Mr.Jisho JamesS/o K.V.James,Kunnath House,Chembukadave.P.O,Kodenchery,Kozhikode-670580............Complainant(s)Versus1. Ramtech Laptop Clinic1st Floor,Trade Center Build...

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Shifa Clinic V/S Rashid

Clinic  

Court Name: Muradabad-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 12-02-2021

Uttarakhand

My family Clinic V/S Vedprakash

Clinic  

Court Name: Hardwar

Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Yadav

Respondant Advocate S.K. Bhama

Case Number: 350

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 06-02-2021

Haryana

Poly Clinic ECHS V/S Hav Satyavir Singh(Retd.)

Clinic  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Complainant in Person

Respondant Advocate Sh. Sub Maj. Raj Rishi Suhag

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/199( Date of Filing : 17 Jun 2020 )1. Hav Satyavir Singh(Retd.)Near Jogi Chopal, Hanuman Colony, Rohtak-124001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Poly Clinic ECHSTilak Nagar, Rohtak2. Regional ...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 01-01-2021

Telangana

Pearl Dental Clinic V/S Smt. Neha Jain

Clinic   Dental  

Court Name: Hyderabad-II

Appelant Advocate M/s. Dinesh Mundada

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 584

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 22-01-2021

Uttar Pradesh

M/s Wealth Clinic Pvt. V/S Mr. Dipanshu Gupta

Clinic  

Court Name: Muradabad-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Dispossed Off Converted into CC/67/2020...

Case Number: 22

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 24-12-2020

Kerala

Abhaya Clinic Laboratory V/S Kuryan.K.J

Clinic   Laboratory  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKANNURComplaint Case No. CC/10/2018( Date of Filing : 12 Jan 2018 )1. Kuryan.K.JS/o Joseph,Kuzhikandathil House,Ambayathode,P.O.Ambayathode,Kannur-670651............Complainant(s)Versus1. Abhaya Clinic LaboratoryKottiyur,Needunokki,P.O.Kott...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2020

Gujarat

SKINSIGHT CLINIC V/S SOYANTER KHUSHBU DHIRAJKUMAR

Clinic  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 10-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 31-12-2020

Chandigarh

Dr. Anshu Soni, BDS, Sono Dental Care Center, Clinic V/S Ms. Veena Suri

Clinic   Dental  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sudhir Gupta, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:134 of 2020Date of Institution:24.02.2020Date of Decision:07.12.2020Mrs.Veena Suri aged 75 years a Sr.Citizen wife of Late Sh.Tirlochan Singh Suri, r/o 2778, Palsaura, Sector 55, UT, Chandigar...

Case Number: 134

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 23-12-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.