Clinic
Latest Judgments
Total 770 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.
1. Maithri Speciality Clinic V/S Mr. Jeseph V. Nazareth (Retired Assistant Sub Inspector of Police),
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Manjunatha CBT.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2021
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2023
M/s Ansh Clinic V/S Devendra Thakkar
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Manoj Kumar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/381/2021Date of Institution:11/06/2021Date of Decision:01/12/2023Devendra Thakkar s/o late Shri Kanubhai Tanna, permanent r/o House No.8, Padma Prabhu Nagar, IOC Road, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad,...
Case Number: 381
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2021
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2023
Harsha Agri Clinic & Agri Business Center V/S Sri R Aravind
Court Name: Bellary
Appelant Advocate H M Ankalaiah
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2023
DR SAPNA BISWAS CALCUTTA POLY CLINIC V/S AMIT KUMAR S/O LAXMAN SINGH
Court Name: Baghpat
Appelant Advocate MANI DEV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2023
Dr.Rajkumari Patel , Dr.Ramdular Patel Clinic R.K Hospital urf R.D Clinic Narayanpur Bazar thana Ad V/S Eslam Ahmad
Court Name: Mirzapur
Appelant Advocate Mr.Mustak ahmad
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2023
Chandigarh Digital X-Ray Clinic V/S Janardhan S/o Ishaq Lal
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Ravi Bhushan
Respondant Advocate
CC No.428 of 2023.Janardhan Vs. Chandigarh Digital X-Ray.Present: Sh. Ravi Bhushan, Adv. for the complainant. Complaint presented before the registry of this Commission on 16.11.2023 and put up before this Commission on today itself. It is hereby ordered to be registered agains...
Case Number: 428
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2023
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2023
MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN,M/S INVESTORS CLINIC INFRATECH PVT.LTD. V/S SATISH KUMAR GOYAL.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:313 of 2020Date of Institution:09.10.2020Date of Decision:16.11.2023Satish Kumar Goyal, age 70 years, s/o Sh. B.R.Goyal, 402, GH-5, MDC Sector-6, Panchkula-134114. ..….ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2023
Prof. Dr. Krishna Nayak U.S, Nayaks Dental Clinic and Orthodontic Center, N.G Road, Attavara, Mangal V/S Gregory Pio Royan D'souza, Tilak Park, Vijayapura, Chikkamagaluru
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate Gerald Dias
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2023
A. HELEN VICTORIA & ANR. V/S M/S. CLINIC NALLAM & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, MR. SHAILENDERA KISHORE SINGH, MR. KRISHNA DEV,MS. SHRUTI IYER & SURITI CHOWDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR.ANKUL RAJ & MRS.NIKITA RAJ
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 296 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/04/2012 in Complaint No. 2/2004 of the State Commission Pondicherry)1. M/S. CLINIC NALLAM & ANR.74, Easwaran Koli Street, PUDUCHERRY2. DR. V. NALLAM,No. 28, Vallalar S...
Case Number: 296
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2023
DR. GUPTA DENTAL AND BRACES CLINIC V/S KAMLA GARG
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate YASIR CHAUDHARY & ASSO.
Respondant Advocate
Convenient Shopping Centre, Saini Enclave, DELHI -110092DELHI EASTComplaint Case No. CC/352/2023( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2023 )1. KAMLA GARGR/O HOUSE-221, DAYANAND VIHAR, GROUND FLOOR, DELHI-92...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DR. GUPTA DENTAL AND BRACES CLINICC-190, LGF VIVEK V...
Case Number: 352
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2023
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.