company-name-logo

Cidco

Latest Judgments

Total 46 Consumer Court Cases Against Cidco.

Maharashtra

Administator, CIDCO Nanded V/S Maroti Jalaba Mane

Cidco  

Court Name: Nanded

Appelant Advocate Adv. U. A. Paul

Respondant Advocate

District consumer Disputes Redressal Forum NandedVisava Nagar, V.I.P. Road, NandedComplaint Case No. CC/13/2091. Maroti Jalaba ManeNH-10, HUDCO, NandedNANDEDMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Administator, CIDCO NandedCIDCO New NandedNANDEDMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Par...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-04-2015

Maharashtra

Estate Officer CIDCO Ltd V/S SMT. OM RANI T. GROVEWR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERSHRI ANIL T. GROVER.

Cidco  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2015

Maharashtra

MANAGING DIRECTOR, CIDCO LTD., V/S M/S SHAH & CHHEDA REALITY BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS,

Cidco  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr.U.B. Wavikar

Respondant Advocate Mr.Prakash Kadam

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/99/5681. M/S SHAH & CHHEDA REALITY BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS,B-21, MAHAVIR MARKET, SECTOR 18, PLOT NO.1, VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI-705............Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGING DIRECTO...

Case Number: 99

|

Date of Filing: 14-12-1999

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

CIDCO LTD . V/S DR. ADITYA DHOPTATKAR & ANR

Cidco  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAILESH MADIYAL

Respondant Advocate MR. AJIT S. BHASME

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 27 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/05/2007 in Appeal No. 317/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. DR. ADITYA DHOPTATKAR & ANRRESIDING AT RH - 6, SHIVA - PARVATI CHS LTD. SECTOR - 21, NERUL, NA...

Case Number: 27

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2013

Maharashtra

CIDCO & ORS V/S MR SANDEEP BHUSAN JAIN

Cidco  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate B KAMBLE & R K Dave

Respondant Advocate Mr.D.G. Dhanure

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/711. MR SANDEEP BHUSAN JAINR/O. BALAJI DARSHAN CHS LTD., PLOT NO. 113/114, FLAT NO. 901, 9TH FLOOR, SECTOR-18-A, NERUL (WEST), NAVI MUMBAI - 400 706.NAVI MUMBAIMaharastra....

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

CIDCO & ORS V/S MR BHUSAN CHIMANLAL JAIN

Cidco  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate BALIRAM KAMBLE & R K Dave

Respondant Advocate Hemant Prabhulkar

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/701. MR BHUSAN CHIMANLAL JAINR/O. BALAJI DARSHAN CHS LTD., PLOT NO. 113/114, FLAT NO. 901, 9TH FLOOR, SECTOR 18-A NERUL (WEST) NAVI MUMBAI - 400 706.NAVI MUMBAIMaharastra....

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

THE JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR CIDCO LTD. V/S DILIP SHANKAR INAMDAR

Cidco  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate -

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/00/643(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/11/1999 in Case No. 92/1996 of District Raigarh)1. DILIP SHANKAR INAMDARFLAT NO.3, SAI PARK APTS, OPP. GANESH POOJA, CHARWAK CHOWK, INDIRANAG...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2000

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

CIDCO OF & ORS. V/S M/S ARENJA INDUSTRIES LTD.

Cidco  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MOHAN LAW CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. AJIT BHASME

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1 OF 20011. M/S ARENJA INDUSTRIES LTD.507 , SHARDA CHAMBERS ,15, NEW MARINE LINES MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CIDCO OF & ORS.NIRMAL , 2ND FLOOR ,NARIMON POINT MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA.......

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2001

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2012

NCDRC

SANJEEV DINKARRAO SHELAR V/S ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO

Cidco  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJIT S. BHASME

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2605 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/12/2010 in Appeal No. 192/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCOCIDCO Aurangabad through Pramode Nenaji Khadche Estate Officer, CIDCO Au...

Case Number: 2605

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2011

NCDRC

SANJEEV DINKARRAO SHELAR V/S ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO

Cidco  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJIT S. BHASME

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2604 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/12/2010 in Appeal No. 185/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCOCIDCO Aurangabad through Pramode Nenaji Khadche Estate Officer, CIDCO Au...

Case Number: 2604

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cidco in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cidco ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cidco under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.