Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S K.MAHESWARA RAO
Respondant Advocate Mr.S.S.Pervaiz
First Appeal No. FA/103/09(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2008 in Case No. C.C.No.497/2008 of District Visakhapatnam-II)1. M/S SHRIRAM CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NO.44, SAROJINI DEVI ROAD, SECUNDERABAD.Andhra Pradesh2. M/S SHRIRAM CHIT FUND PVT.LTD. REP.B...
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 628
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/629/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MR.SINGIRIKONDA DAMODER R/O H.NO.9-2-97, YELLAM BAZAR, WARANGAL.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJAPRESENTLY ...
Case Number: 629
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 631
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/632/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MR.JAMMULA RANGA REDDY S/O JAMMULA LAXMA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 632
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 633
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 634
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...
Case Number: 635
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mahbubnagar
Appelant Advocate Sri N. Madhusudhan Yadav
Respondant Advocate Sri C. Rajeev Kumar
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGARFriday, the 22nd day of July, 2011 Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President Sri A. Veerupakshi, B.A., LL.B., Member Smt.D.Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B.,MemberC.C.NO....
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Chit Fund in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Chit Fund ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Chit Fund under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.