company-name-logo

Chit Fund

Latest Judgments

Total 494 Consumer Court Cases Against Chit Fund.

Andhra Pradesh

MR.M.BALAKRISHNA RAO V/S M/S SHRIRAM CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S K.MAHESWARA RAO

Respondant Advocate Mr.S.S.Pervaiz

First Appeal No. FA/103/09(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2008 in Case No. C.C.No.497/2008 of District Visakhapatnam-II)1. M/S SHRIRAM CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NO.44, SAROJINI DEVI ROAD, SECUNDERABAD.Andhra Pradesh2. M/S SHRIRAM CHIT FUND PVT.LTD. REP.B...

Case Number: 103

|

Date of Filing: 29-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 628

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MR.SINGIRIKONDA DAMODER

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/629/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MR.SINGIRIKONDA DAMODER R/O H.NO.9-2-97, YELLAM BAZAR, WARANGAL.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJAPRESENTLY ...

Case Number: 629

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 630

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 631

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MR.JAMMULA RANGA REDDY S/O JAMMULA LAXMA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/632/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MR.JAMMULA RANGA REDDY S/O JAMMULA LAXMA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 632

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 633

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 634

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

M/S RAJANI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD, SMT.VANAJA V/S MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDY

Chit Fund  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/628/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MRS.KUNDURU SUBHASHINI W/O JAMMULA RANGA REDDYPRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.1-8-467, MADATI NARASIMHA REDDY QTS., BALASAMUDRAM, HANAMKONDA DIST.WARANGALAndhra Pradesh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 635

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

Kapil Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd., V/S V. Channaiah S/o Hanmaiah,

Chit Fund  

Court Name: Mahbubnagar

Appelant Advocate Sri N. Madhusudhan Yadav

Respondant Advocate Sri C. Rajeev Kumar

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGARFriday, the 22nd day of July, 2011 Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President Sri A. Veerupakshi, B.A., LL.B., Member Smt.D.Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B.,MemberC.C.NO....

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Chit Fund in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Chit Fund ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Chit Fund under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.