Chit Fund
Latest Judgments
Total 494 Consumer Court Cases Against Chit Fund.
Ghousia Begum, D/o. Jaffar Mia, age: 19 Years, R/o. H.No.6-3-44/F/6, Behind Menaka Talkies, Mahabub V/S M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.
Chit Fund Finance Finance Petrol
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. B.Sai Kalyan Chakravathi
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 372 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/05/2013 in Case No. CC/79/2004 of District Mahbubnagar)1. M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.2. 1.P. Indrasenva Reddy...
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Roshan Ara, W/o. Mohd. Hameeduddin Khan, Age 34 Years, Occ:House wife, R/o. H.No.3-34-39/1, Madina M V/S M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.
Chit Fund Finance Finance Petrol
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. B.Sai Kalyan Chakravathi
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 373 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/05/2013 in Case No. CC/80/2004 of District Mahbubnagar)1. M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.2. 1.P. Indrasenva Reddy...
Case Number: 373
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Roshan ARa, W/o. Mohd. Hameeduddin Khan, Age 34 Years, Occ: House wife, R/o. H.No.3-34-39/1, Madina V/S M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.
Chit Fund Finance Finance Petrol
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. B.Sai Kalyan Chakravathi
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 374 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/05/2013 in Case No. CC/81/2004 of District Mahbubnagar)1. M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.2. 1.P. Indrasenva Reddy...
Case Number: 374
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Roshan Ara, W/o. Mohd.Hameeduddin Khan, Age: 34 Years, Occ: House wife, R/o. Madina Masjid, Mahabub V/S M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.
Chit Fund Finance Finance Petrol
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. B.Sai Kalyan Chakravathi
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 375 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/05/2013 in Case No. CC/82/2004 of District Mahbubnagar)1. M/s. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Private Limited, Regd. Office: 7-5-108/B, Opp. Petrol Bunk, Venkateswara Colony, Mahabubnagar, Rep. by its Director.2. 1.P. Indrasenva Reddy...
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
VIJAY BHARGAVI CHIT FUND (P) LTD. V/S M. SRINIVAS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. B. SANGEETHA RAM
Respondant Advocate MR. R. SANTHANAN KRISHNAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3230 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/05/2012 in Appeal No. 736/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M. SRINIVASS/o Shri late M Jangaiah R/o H.no-23-5-861/12 Rajpal Nagar, Opp Sudha Talkies...
Case Number: 3230
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2013
MR. S. RAJESHWAR, S/O SRI BALARAM, AGED 40 YEARS, V/S THE CHIEF MANAGER, M/S KAPIL CHIT FUND PRIVATE LTD.,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.N. AMARNATH
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/176/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/01/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/26/2011 of District Medak)1. THE CHIEF MANAGER, M/S KAPIL CHIT FUND PRIVATE LTD., D.NO. 1-8-104, NEAR MUNICIPALITY OFFICE, MEDAK............Appellant(s)Versus1. MR. S. RAJESHWAR, S...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MALLA MANMADHA RAO, S/O LATE ANANDHA RAO, AGED 37 YEARS, V/S 1. THE MANAGER, M/S. SRI VENKATARAYA CHIT FUND PRIVATE LTD.,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY
Respondant Advocate M/s. T. Bheema Rao,
First Appeal No. FA/252/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/01/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/55/2010 of District Srikakulam)1. 1. THE MANAGER, M/S. SRI VENKATARAYA CHIT FUND PRIVATE LTD.,ARASAVALLI ROAD, SRIKAKULAM.2. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S SRI VENKATARAYA CHIT FUND...
Case Number: 252
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S Chalapathi Chit Fund (Private ) Limited,Represented by its Manager, V/S G.Geetha Sudha, W/o Madhusudhan ,
Court Name: Kurnool
Appelant Advocate H.K.Jalandhar
Respondant Advocate Absent
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/17/20131. G.Geetha Sudha, W/o Madhusudhan ,R/o H.No.51/1043, Seetaram Nagar, Kurnool 518 003.Kurnool Andhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Chalapathi Chit Fund (Private ) Limited,Represented by its Manager,D.No.14/01, 1st Floor,...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MANAGER, DHANAKODI CHIT FUND V/S BHASKARAN THAROLKANDI
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/488/20121. BHASKARAN THAROLKANDIPOONATH.P.O NADUVANNUR (via) 673618KOZHIKODE...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER, DHANAKODI CHIT FUNDBALUSSERY BRANCH KOZHIKODE-673612............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENTHONOURA...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
. The Manager, Kapil Chit Fund V/S D.Pradeep Kumar, S/o.Lingaiah
Court Name: Adilabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Chit Fund in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Chit Fund ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Chit Fund under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.