Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate G.S Kalkura
Respondant Advocate S.Raghukumar
Complaint Case No. 207/20041. Maniyan Greeshma Bhavan,Mohanapuram,Pothenkod,Tvpm ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Cargo Sales Manager Airindia,Air Cargo complex,Tvpm 2. General ManagerAir India,Tvpm ThiruvananthapuramKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Sri G. Sivaprasad PRESI...
Case Number: 207
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. PDF/595/20091. SHELL KUMARBAVDHAN, PUNE21...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DOT COURIER CARGO LTDNANA PETH PUNE 2............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT Shri. S. K. Kapase MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERश्री. एस.के.कापसे,...
Case Number: 595
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/06/1361. PEGASUS HEALTHCARE LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR MR. A.BORAHIMALAYA ESTATE, 16-A, SHIVAJINAGAR, PUNE-411005............Complainant(s)Versus1. EARTH EXPRESS CARGO PVT.LTD. THR...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Vinod Sharma
Respondant Advocate Mr. Vijay Waghela
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/98/2921. Vinay Cargo Movers19, Saraswati Sadan, 115, Keshavjii Naik Road, Chinch Bunder, Mumbai 400 009.MumbaiMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Ramdev Cargo C...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-1998
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 388 of 2011 1. Dr. O.N. BhargavaR/o # 103, Sector 7, Panchkula. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. On Dot Couriers & Cargo Limited,through its Managing Director, 8/24, Kirti Nagar, Industrial area, New Delhi-110015.2. On Dot ...
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate K.PAVITHRAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 198 Of 20111. JYOTHI RAMESHCHOMPOYIL HOUSE, P.O. WEST HILL, CALICUT 673005...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC COURIER & CARGO LTDBANK ROAD, NEAR KURISHUPALLI, CALICUT.2. REGIONAL MANAGERDTDC COURIER SERVICES, NEAR NORTH RAILWAY STATION, COCHIN.............Opp.Party(s) B...
Case Number: 198
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
National Insurance Cargo National Insurance Company Insurance Insurance
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhEXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 54 of 2011 1. M/s Awagman Cargo Carriers Pvt. Ltd.carriers Pvt.Ltd. Plot No. 20, Transport Area, Sector-26 Chandigarh-160019 ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. national Insurance Company Ltd.SCO NO. 133-134-135 2nd Fl...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/1201. Lt.Pritosh AgarwalTes-16,Fe/M,CME,Dapodi.Pune 31PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dtdc CourierAnd Cargo Ltd,throughMr.Shrikant DeshpandeDeccan Gymkhana Pune 04PuneMaha2. Pune Apex(Ho) Shop No-1,Hidyatulla ComplexBhawani Peth,Opp,shankar shet...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate G.J.Ravi Kumar
Respondant Advocate D.V. SAINATH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/11/1241. Chinnama Siva KumariChinnama Siva Kumari D/O.Venkateswarlu President, Bhonika Rural and urban development Socity H.No:15-18-91, 2 nd LINE Maruthi Nager GunturGunturA P...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S.DTDC...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate S.S.Mavani
Respondant Advocate H.N.Asnani
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2020
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.