Cargo
Latest Judgments
Total 1265 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.
GATI COURIER AND CARGO V/S SUNRISE SYSTEM
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2016
RAJ KARIG CARGO PVT.LTD V/S PRAMUKHASHREE GRAHAK SURAKSHA SIKSAN FORUM PALANPUR
Court Name: Banas Kantha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2020
Daman Preet Singh V/S M/s DTDC Courier & cargo Limited,
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. G.L.Aggarwal Adv. for the applicants/ appellants
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 292 of 2012 1. M/s DTDC Courier & cargo Limited,Regional office, B-10, Phase-1, Industrial Area,Naraina New Delhi-110028 through ...
Case Number: 292
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. ALITALIA CARGO & ANR. V/S ALM LEATHER EXPORTS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HARI RADHAKRISHNAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/10/2011 in Complaint No. 20/2007 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. ALM LEATHER EXPORTSRep. by its Partner Mr. J. Jakir Ahmad, Pariamet, Chennai-600003Tamil Nadu......
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2012
DTDC Corier & Cargo Ltd. Thro Shubhang Kulkarni ARMPune V/S S.D.Raste
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/831. S.D.RasteFlat no. 6, Devganga Apt., 589,Shaniwar peth Pune30PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC Corier & Cargo Ltd. Thro Shubhang Kulkarni ARMPuneShop no. 1 Hidayatulla Complex, opp Shankarshet Road,Pune 42 PuneMaha2. Reliance Energy Ltd.(...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sai Cargo Packers & Movers V/S Sri. Maharudayya Nandimath, Son of Sri. Shivarudraiah, aged about 32 Years
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/111. Sri. Maharudayya Nandimath, Son of Sri. Shivarudraiah, aged about 32 Years Residing at No. 369, 4th Aven...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. AIR FRANCE CARGO AND ANR. V/S M/S. WINSOME GARMENTS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.R. KOVILAN
Respondant Advocate M/S. PASRICH & CO., & MR. KALYAN ARAMBAM
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 481 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 28/04/2006 in Complaint No. 156/1999 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. M/S. WINSOME GARMENTSS F NO 362/2 NOCHIPALAYAM ROAD, AB NAGAR, VEERAPANDY POST, TIRUPUR - 641 605.......
Case Number: 481
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2012
MANAGER, AIR INDIA CARGO COMPLEX V/S K.N. SELVESTOR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1827 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/01/2012 in Appeal No. 570/2011 of the State Commission Kerala)1. K.N. SELVESTORS/o J Keleese, Vijayasadanam Uchakkada POThirucananthapuramKerela...........Petiti...
Case Number: 1827
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2012
DTDC Courier& Cargo Ltd. V/S M/s Fragrance Exim Pvt. Limited,
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Baljinder Singh Sra
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 228 of 2011 1. M/s Fragrance Exim Pvt. Limited, 41, Indl. Area Phase- II, Chandigarh, India-160047, Through its Director Shri Surinder Kohli s/o sh...
Case Number: 228
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CARGO MOTORS PVT.LTD. V/S SHIVSINGH BHAVARSINGH SHEKHAVAT
Court Name: Gandhinagar
Appelant Advocate B.R.SHARMA,S.R.UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate BHADRESH.M.RATHOD,V.S.DAVE
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.