Cargo
Latest Judgments
Total 1265 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.
MUKHYA PRABANDHAK EXPRESS CARGO CARIOUS PRIVET LIMITED V/S VIJAY SURANA AGE 45 YEAR S/O SHRI NANDKISHOR SURANA PROPRIETOR SURANA RAISE MILL KATANGI ROAD WARASEONI
Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2021
LT MR SNEHIL SOOD V/S M/S BALAJI CARGO CARRIERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S GAWANDE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/12/877(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/07/2012 in Case No. 276/2011 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. M/S BALAJI CARGO CARRIERSSHOP NO 10 PLOT NO 17 SHREENATH HEIGHTS PURNANAGAR...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
On Dot Couriers & Cargo Ltd. V/S Dattatrya Vishnudeo Vaidya
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/12/2021. Dattatrya Vishnudeo Vaidya3,Vedanta Gad,Meghana Soct.Sahakrnagar,No-2,Pune 411 009.PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. On Dot Couriers & Cargo Ltd.8/42,Kirtinagar,Industrial Area,New Delhi-110015DelhiDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bharathi Airtel Ltd V/S Sindhu Cargo Service Ltd
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2022
GATI COURIER & CARGO LIMITED V/S SUNRISE SYSTEM THROUGH PROPRIETOR HEMANT NIGAM
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 587
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2016
CARGO MOTORS PVT.LTD. V/S NIRANJAN C. MATARVALA
Court Name: Gandhinagar
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate BHADRESH.M.RATHOD
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2017
Amrit lal Satija V/S M/s DTDC Courier & Cargo Limited
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.G.L.aggarwal Adv. for the applicant/appellant
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 328 of 2012 1. M/s DTDC Courier & Cargo LimitedCorporate office: DTDC House, House No.3, Victoria Road, Banglore ...........Appel...
Case Number: 328
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd V/S Pankaj Ku;mar
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/12/441. Pankaj Ku;marson of Makhan lal r/o H.No.227,Veer colony,Bathinda...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DTDC Courier & Cargo LtdRegd.o...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Ruby Cargo V/S C.V.C and Another
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/12/1761. C.V.C and AnotherTVM2. P.A Subhash BoseNaruvamoodu...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ruby CargoOpp Domestic Terminal, Airport............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
INTERNATIONAL PASSAGE AND CARGO SERVICE V/S MADAN CARPETS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate D.K.SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. DEVVRAT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 146 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 02/12/2005 in Complaint No. 7/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MADAN CARPETS377 , ACHARYA MARENDRA DEV MARG , NARGHAT , MIRZAPUR - -...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2006
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.