company-name-logo

Cargo

Latest Judgments

Total 1260 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.

Madhya Pradesh

GATI COURIER CARGO LTD. V/S SURNRISE SYSTEM

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2016

Gujarat

CARGO MOTORS PVT LTD V/S 1. JAGRAT NAGRIK 2. WG CDR GK NAIR

Cargo  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate L K BHAYA

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2020

NCDRC

ON DOT COURIER & CARGO LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S NATIONAL TRUST MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM AWASTHI & MR. NIKHIL JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 191 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/02/2012 in Complaint No. 230/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NATIONAL TRUST MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENTGovt of India, 16B, Bada Bazar Marg, Old Raji...

Case Number: 191

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2012

Kerala

CARGO SALES MANAGER,AIR INDIA V/S MANIYAN

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate G.S.KALKURA

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/12/268(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/11/2011 in Case No. CC/04/207 of District Thiruvananthapuram)1. MANIYANGREESHMA BHAVAN,MOHANAPURAM,POTHENCODETRIVANDRUMKERALA...........Appella...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

Manager, D.T.D.C. Courier and Cargo Ltd V/S P.Venugopal

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Trissur

Appelant Advocate K.Arunkumar Kaimal

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/08/19( Date of Filing : 04 Jan 2008 )1. P.VenugopalGokul Kannangath Lane ThrissurThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, D.T.D.C. Courier and Cargo LtdWest Fort ThrissurKerala2. Mg Directo...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 04-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2022

Madhya Pradesh

Case Number: 37

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2021

Maharashtra

LT MR SNEHIL SOOD V/S M/S BALAJI CARGO CARRIERS

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S GAWANDE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/12/877(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/07/2012 in Case No. 276/2011 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. M/S BALAJI CARGO CARRIERSSHOP NO 10 PLOT NO 17 SHREENATH HEIGHTS PURNANAGAR...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

On Dot Couriers & Cargo Ltd. V/S Dattatrya Vishnudeo Vaidya

Cargo  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate -

Complaint Case No. CC/12/2021. Dattatrya Vishnudeo Vaidya3,Vedanta Gad,Meghana Soct.Sahakrnagar,No-2,Pune 411 009.PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. On Dot Couriers & Cargo Ltd.8/42,Kirtinagar,Industrial Area,New Delhi-110015DelhiDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. ...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Bharathi Airtel Ltd V/S Sindhu Cargo Service Ltd

Airtel   Cargo   Bharathi Airtel  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 326

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-03-2022

Madhya Pradesh

GATI COURIER & CARGO LIMITED V/S SUNRISE SYSTEM THROUGH PROPRIETOR HEMANT NIGAM

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 587

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.