company-name-logo

Cargo

Latest Judgments

Total 1260 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.

West Bengal

1) Office-in-Charge, D.T.D.C Courier and cargo ltd V/S Shyamal Saha,

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Birbhum

Appelant Advocate Pareshnath Mukherjee

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

1,Sai Cargo Packers & Movers V/S Sri. Maharudayya Nandimath, Son of Sri. Shivarudraiah, aged about 32 Years

Cargo   Packers & Movers  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/12/631. Sri. Maharudayya Nandimath, Son of Sri. Shivarudraiah, aged about 32 Years Residing at No. 369, 4...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Singh Cargo Cervic V/S Satynarayan Pandya

Cargo  

Court Name: Ujjain

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 227

|

Date of Filing: 10-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-06-2016

West Bengal

D.T.D.C. COURIER & CARGO LTD. & ANOTHER V/S NOMAAN BROTHERS

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/238/2010 1. NOMAAN BROTHERS20, SUKESH LANE, KOLKATA-700001. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. D.T.D.C. COURIER & CARGO LTD. & ANOTHERDTDC BHAVAN, 404/405, KAZI NAZRUL ISLAM SARANI, VIP ROAD, RAGHUNAT...

Case Number: 238

|

Date of Filing: 06-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Globe Packers and Cargo Movers V/S Ajay Singh

Cargo  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 858

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-04-2022

NCDRC

LUFTHANSA CARGO INDIA PVT. LTD. V/S AFL Ltd.

Cargo   Lufthansa  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN & CO.

Respondant Advocate MS. YASHMEET KAUR & MS. APARNA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 310 OF 19991. AFL LTD.-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. LUFTHANSA CARGO INDIA PVT. LTD.-...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, M...

Case Number: 310

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-1999

|

Date of Upload: 31-10-2013

Gujarat

Om International Courier & cargo V/S J V Hajarika

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate R T Jolapara

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 20-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 04-03-2020

NCDRC

M/S. GATI CARGO MANAGEMENT SERVICES V/S M/S. NARESH INTERNATIONAL

Cargo  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY KUMAR PORWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 486 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 10/07/2008 in Complaint No. 195/2000 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. NARESH INTERNATIONALThrough its Partner Sh. Naresh Chand, 497, Katra Ishwar Bhawan, Khari Baoli...

Case Number: 486

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2008

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2013

Chandigarh

Nitin Kohli V/S DTDC Courier & cargo

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. G.L.Aggarwal, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ms. Pooja Kohli, wife of the respondent in person

First Appeal No. FA/354/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. DTDC Courier & cargoChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Nitin KohliS/o Sh. M.M. Kohli, Prop. of M/s NTN Minerals and Chemicals, Plot no. 23, Phase-2, Industrial Area, Chandigarh...........Resp...

Case Number: 354

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

M/s. Aero Wings Travel & Cargo Agency V/S Mohammed Abdul Aleem

Travel   Cargo  

Court Name: Hyderabad-III

Appelant Advocate MD Muneeruddin

Respondant Advocate Md.Mazhar

Case Number: 361

|

Date of Filing: 05-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.