company-name-logo

Cargo

Latest Judgments

Total 1260 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.

Karnataka

The Proprietor, Sea Bird Express Cargo V/S Ramdas K Naik

Cargo  

Court Name: Uttara Kannda

Appelant Advocate V.A Todurkar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 18-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2020

Madhya Pradesh

maneger courier serviceand cargo ltd. V/S ramniwas rathor

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Bhind

Appelant Advocate samod sharma

Respondant Advocate DHARMEND SINGH BHADURIYA

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 21-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2016

West Bengal

The Manager DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd V/S Mr. Rashmi Thacker

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: North 24 Parganas

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 612

|

Date of Filing: 17-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2016

Gujarat

I.C.I.C.I LOMBARD GEN.INS.BHUJ V/S ME.KANDALA CARGO CARRIERS KRUSHNA BHAGWAN RAJARAM SHARMA-GHANDHIDHAM

Cargo  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate R P THACKER

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2020

Maharashtra

DTDc Couriier and cargo Ltd.,and Others V/S SAS EngineeringRepresented through its Partner Mr. Hemantkumar

Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune

Appelant Advocate S .S. Kuvlekar

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/12/1571. SAS EngineeringRepresented through its Partner Mr. Hemantkumar401,Rohan Tower,Opp.Mega Mart, Mumbai_-Pune Road, Dapodi,Pune-411 012Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDc Couriier and cargo Ltd.,and OthersDTDC House,No.3, Victoria Road,Ban...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Manager, Cargo Bhuj Honda V/S Kutch Jilla Grahak Suraxa Mandal-Memen AbdulKadar Haji Ismail

Honda   Cargo  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate J.G.Bhatt

Respondant Advocate A N KELA

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2020

Kerala

Al Mosalem Cargo LIC V/S Arun K V

Cargo   Lic  

Court Name: Pathanamthitta

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumPathanamthittaComplaint Case No. CC/13/1631. Arun K VVarambel House, Pathalin Colony, Nelliikkala P O., Pathanamthitta. 6896432. Sunitha ArunVarambel House, Pathalil Colony, Nellikkala P.O., Pathanamthitta. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Al Mos...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

CARGO MOTORS LIMITED V/S R GANDHI AND COMPANY

Cargo  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl

Appelant Advocate NEETA A SHAH

Respondant Advocate L K BHARYA & V M PANCHOLI

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2019

Arunachal Pradesh

DTDC courier and cargo Ltd. V/S Shri T.Chowdhary

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: Papum Pare

Appelant Advocate Mr.N.Opo

Respondant Advocate

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPAPUM PARE DISTRICT YUPIAARUNACHAL PRADESHComplaint Case No. LMCA-132/20141. Shri T.Chowdhary Naharlagun...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC courier and cargo Ltd.Naharlagun............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES Mr.Budi ...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 28-09-2016

Andhra Pradesh

Dr. C. Surya Prabash Reddy Age: 38 Years, S/o. C. Siddiram Reddy, H.No.17-1-388/P/51, Poornodaya Col V/S Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad Office at 1-10-3/2, Cargo Office Building, Opp Old Air Port, Behid Bottles & Chimney, Prakash Nagar,

Institute   Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Deepak Sabharwal & Associates. Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao,

Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Ravi Teja

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/599/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2012 in Case No. CC/296/2010 of District Hyderabad)1. Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad O...

Case Number: 599

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.