Cargo
Latest Judgments
Total 1260 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.
M/s ATS Cargo (P)Ltd V/S M/s Sidh Fabrics Pvt Ltd
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. C.C. No.498 of 16.07.2014 Date of Decision:31/03/2015M/s Sidh Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. c/o 3125/2, Gali No.5, Mahavir Jain Colony, Sunder Nagar, Ludhiana through its Authorized representative/Director Mr.Saurabh Jain s/o S...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2015
ANDHRA CARGO V/S MONTI COLLECTION
Court Name: Jaipur-III
Appelant Advocate ANIL SAXENA
Respondant Advocate MANGILAL CHOUDHARY
Case Number: 745
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2015
DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd., V/S Dr. Dhananjay P. Ghanwat (IPS),
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Patekar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2015
DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd., V/S Dr. Ravindra Kaluram Wable,
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Patekar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2015
The Proprietor. The D.T.D.C Courier & Cargo Ltd V/S Rajesh S/o. F Hutagi
Court Name: Belgaum
Appelant Advocate S.S..Hanchinal
Respondant Advocate
(Order dictated by Shri. V.S. Gotakhindi, Member)ORDER U/s. 12 of the C.P. Act, the complainant has filed the complaint against the O.Ps. alleging deficiency of courier service. 2) The O.Ps. appeared through advocate and contended and admit that complainant booked the consignment...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2015
M/S. DTDC CORUIER & CARGO LTD. & ANOTHER. V/S VISHAL KHANDELWAL
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Execution Application No. EA/150/2014InComplaint Case No. CC/386/20121. VISHAL KHANDELWAL62A,HARI GHOSH STREET,KOLKATA-700006............Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2017
Aditi Express Cargo India Pvt Ltd. V/S Shri Jibankar Bordoloi
Court Name: Kamrup
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/49/2014( Date of Filing : 12 May 2014 )1. Shri Jibankar BordoloiS/O- Sri Sishir Kumar Bordoloi, Debadaru Path, 1st By Lane (Left), H.No-13, Dspur, Guwahati-6, Dist-Kamrup(M), Assam...........Complainan...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2022
Durga Cargo Movers, Manager V/S Sube Singh Dhaka
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionCercuit Bench JodhpurFirst Appeal No. A/23/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/11/2014 in Case No. 69/2007 of District Jodhpur)1. Sube Singh Dhakaquater no. 994/3, ratanada, jodhpurJodhpurRajasthan...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2015
Suman Cargo Carrier V/S A Tuljareddi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionCercuit Bench JodhpurFirst Appeal No. A/24/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/11/2014 in Case No. 71/2008 of District Jodhpur)1. A Tuljareddi879/1, d j colony, airforce station, jodhpurJodhpurRajasthan...........Appellant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2015
M/s Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ajay Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shiv Kumar
Respondant Advocate P.K. Kukreja
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. 1487 of 2011 Date of institution: 05.10.2011 Date of decision : 09.03.2015Ajay Singh son of Sahdeep Singh resident of V & PO Chelet, PS Amb, District Una (HP) &helli...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.