company-name-logo

Cargo

Latest Judgments

Total 1265 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.

Punjab

Sukhwinder Singh Kohli V/S DTDC Courier and Cargo Ltd.

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ashutosh Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 462

|

Date of Filing: 30-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2016

Haryana

The Manager On Dot Courier And Cargo Ltd. V/S Sudha Kansal W/o Narinder Kansal

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate R.L.Arya

Respondant Advocate None For OP.

BEFORE THE DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM YAMUNA NAGAR JAGADHRI Complaint No. 08 of 2015. Date of Institution: 06.01.2015 Date of Decision:01.09.2016Sudha Kansal aged about 63 years wife of late Shri Narinder Kansal, resident of House No. 1275, 4 Gali, Yamuna Nag...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 06-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2016

Madhya Pradesh

AGRAWAL CARGO PACKERS AND MOVERS V/S Dr. MADHAVDEV SARASWAT

Packers And Movers   Cargo  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate HEMANT SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 250

|

Date of Filing: 30-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2016

Uttar Pradesh

H Roy Private Limited V/S Gati Desk TO DesK Cargo

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate B L Jaiswal, R.K. Verma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/455(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Gati Desk TO DesK CargoA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. H Roy Priva...

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2001

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2017

Andhra Pradesh

The Franchisee, DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd., V/S Kasturi Ramakrishna

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry

Appelant Advocate K. Ramakrishna (IP)

Respondant Advocate -

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-II, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM PRESENT: Smt H.V. Ramana, B.Com., L.L.M., President (FAC)Sri A. Madhusudana Rao, M.Com., B.L., MEMBERCONSUMER COMPLAINT No.26 /2016Monday, the 22nd day of August, 2016Between:-Kasthuri Ra...

Case Number: 26

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-09-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2016

Punjab

Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Surinder Singh

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gurnam Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 241

|

Date of Filing: 03-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2016

Andhra Pradesh

Syed Gaffar Son of Rehmatulla, Aged about 42 Years, Occ Business, V/S 1. The Chairman and Managing Director DTDC Courier Cargo Ltd.,

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. S. Pramod Kumar

Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Venkateswarlu

Case Number: 739

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Meghalaya

DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd. V/S Vikash Agarwal

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: West Garo Hills

Appelant Advocate Manoranjan Chakravarty

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumWest Garo Hills District, TuraMeghalayaComplaint Case No. CC/16/20151. Vikash AgarwalWhole Sale Dealer in Medicines, Aski Market, 1st Floor, TuraWest Garo HillsMeghalaya...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd.Tura Super...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2016

Chhattisgarh

B.M., D.T.D.C Courier & Cargo Ltd. V/S Vivek Joshi

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri R.K. Bhawnani

Respondant Advocate Shri Vinod Pradhan

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.