company-name-logo

Cargo

Latest Judgments

Total 1265 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.

Rajasthan

Kailash Sharma s/o Lat. Ghashi Ram V/S Tantia Travels and Cargo

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ajay Tantia

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2018

NCDRC

D.T.D.C. COURIER AND CARGO LIMITED & 4 ORS. V/S ASHISH VERMA

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate DR. RAJESH PANDEY, MR. RAJ AWASTHI & MR. JITENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MR. M.K. SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 886 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 31/12/2014 in Appeal No. 284/2014 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. ASHISH VERMAS/O MURARI PRASAD, R/O BHATTI ROAD, KEDARPUR, TAHSIL & TEHSIL AMBIKAPUR DISTRIC...

Case Number: 886

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 21-08-2018

Punjab

Jatinder kumar and another V/S M/s Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate D.k bhatti ,vinay puri ,piyush gill and jatinder

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 433

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2018

Gujarat

HARSHADBHAI V DESAI V/S CARGO MOTORS PVT LTD

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V M PANCHOLI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2018

Punjab

kulwant singh V/S M/s Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate d.k bhatti ,viney puri and piyush gill

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 08-08-2018

Punjab

Shri Arshdeep singh V/S M/s Cargo Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate D.K.Bhatti and Vinay Puri and piyush gill

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 08-08-2018

Delhi

Bajaj Allianz Gen. Ins. V/S Expert Cargo

Bajaj Allianz   Bajaj Allianz   Cargo   Bajaj  

Court Name: West Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/15/171( Date of Filing : 16 Mar 2015 )1. Expert CargoDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bajaj Allianz Gen. Ins.DELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2018

Rajasthan

M/s Air India Air Cargo Tirminal V/S M/s K.S.Export Through Proprietor

Cargo   Air India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Inderjeet Chaudhary

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 775

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-07-2018

West Bengal

Tridev Express Cargo V/S Ipsita Saha

Cargo  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/257/2018( Date of Filing : 13 Jun 2018 )1. Ipsita Saha28C, Bondel Road, Flat no.1, Kolkata-700019, P.S. Karaya............Complainant(s...

Case Number: 257

|

Date of Filing: 13-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 16-07-2018

Telangana

1. M/s. DTDC Courier and Cargo Limited V/S M/s Madhucon Projects Limited

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Madhucon Projects Ltd., (P I P)

Respondant Advocate M/s. S. Pramod Kumar OP1 to OP3

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/20/2014( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2014 )1. M/s Madhucon Projects Limited Having its Office at Madhucon House No.1129 A, Road No.36, Jublee Hills, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Mr. G. Baburao, Asst ...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.