company-name-logo

Cargo

Latest Judgments

Total 1260 Consumer Court Cases Against Cargo.

Karnataka

Gati Cargo Packers and Movers V/S Ranjesh Kumar,

Packers And Movers   Cargo  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2020

NCDRC

RASHMI THACKER V/S MANAGER, DTDC EXPRESS LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DTDC COURIERS & CARGO LTD.) & ANR.

Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.K. SINHA

Respondant Advocate MR. AJIT NAIR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3124 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 21/08/2017 in Appeal No. 638/2016 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. MANAGER, DTDC EXPRESS LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DTDC COURIERS & CARGO LTD.) & ANR.404-405 VIP...

Case Number: 3124

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 11-08-2020

Madhya Pradesh

Case Number: 52

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2021

Maharashtra

1 EXPRESS CARGO PACKERS AND MOVERS V/S MR SOHIN SANDEEP DOSHI

Packers And Movers   Cargo  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune

Appelant Advocate ADV SWAPNIL ZHADE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2020

Gujarat

RAJDIPSINGH J ZALA V/S CARGO MOTORS GUJ P LTD.

Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V M PANCHOLI

Respondant Advocate K.B.ZALA

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2020

Punjab

M/s Cargo Motors Pvt Ltd V/S Shri Arshdeep Singh S/o Paramjeet Singh

Cargo  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Nakul Kohli

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/215/2018( Date of Filing : 15 May 2018 )1. Shri Arshdeep Singh S/o Paramjeet SinghR/o HNO.11A, Bank Colony Road, Model House...

Case Number: 215

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2020

NCDRC

IPSITA SAHA V/S M/S. TRIDEV EXPRESS CARGO

Cargo  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SOHAN LAL ADAK

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 72 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 02/12/2019 in Appeal No. 163/2019 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. M/S. TRIDEV EXPRESS CARGO8, CAMAC STREET, SHANTINIKETAN BUILDING ROOM NO. 208, POLICE STATION...

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2020

Kerala

All India Cargo Movers V/S Anitha Sreekuamr

Cargo  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/18/391( Date of Filing : 29 Oct 2018 )1. Anitha Sreekuamrsree nivas,TC 2/1355,PMRAC /16,near KSEB,pattom,Trivandrum...........Complainant(s)Versus1. All India Cargo Moverskula...

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2020

Rajasthan

Sai Shradha Cargo Pvt. Ltd. V/S Gagan Enterprises

Cargo  

Court Name: Udaipur

Appelant Advocate B.S. Chundawat

Respondant Advocate -

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2020

Uttar Pradesh

R D Agarwal V/S D T D C Courier Cargo

Courier   Cargo  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Satya Prakash Pandey

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/2503( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. D T D C Courier Cargo a..............

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 01-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Cargo in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Cargo ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Cargo under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.