company-name-logo

Care

Latest Judgments

Total 6963 Consumer Court Cases Against Care.

NCDRC

DIRECTOR INSCOL TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL & ANR. V/S RANDHIR GARG

Hospital   Care  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate D.C.DHAULA

Respondant Advocate RAKESH BHATIA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 46 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 03/12/2004 in Appeal No. 302/2004 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. RANDHIR GARGR/O H.NO.295, ADVOCATES SOCIETY SECTOR 49-A CHANDIGARH ...........Petitioner(s)Ve...

Case Number: 46

|

Date of Filing: 05-01-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

RAHI HEAR AND CARE V/S VALJIBHAI BAVDASH CHOHAN

Care  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate SELF

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 01-09-2020

Karnataka

NOKIA Care V/S Kanish Kumar Gupta

Nokia   Care  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate IP

Respondant Advocate

IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/428/2009 Kanish Kumar Gupta ...........Appellant(s)Vs.NOKIA Care Hotspots Retails Ltd., ...........Respondent(s) BEFO...

Case Number: 428

|

Date of Filing: 18-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Meghalaya

Nokia Care Centre, G.S.Road V/S Shri Ronald Nongrum

Nokia   Care  

Court Name: East Khasi Hills

Appelant Advocate self

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. 05/2009( Date of Filing : 21 Feb 2009 )1. Shri Ronald Nongrum Shillong...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia Care Centre, G.S.RoadShillong............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE ...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 15-07-2022

Gujarat

Nokia India Pvt.ltd trough Care manager V/S Dip S.joshi

Nokia   Care  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate H.K.Solanki

Respondant Advocate Y.D.bhandarkar

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 01-01-2009

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2020

Karnataka

Nokia Care Centre, V/S Sri.Mohammed Athaulla,

Nokia   Care  

Court Name: Shimoga

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2009

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2020

Madhya Pradesh

Capital Mobile Care Properiter V/S Rajesh Meena

Mobile   Care  

Court Name: Sehore

Appelant Advocate Mr. GD Bairagi

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Raj Mobile Care (Dealer Nokia) V/S Vijendra Sonwane

Mobile   Care  

Court Name: Sehore

Appelant Advocate Mr. GD Bairagi

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 12-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Nokia care service Centre, V/S JAgadish BAbu

Nokia   Care  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/279 JAgadish BAbu ...........Appellant(s...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Jharkhand

Vivek Tulsyan , Prop Nokia Care Centre V/S Binay Kumar Jaiswal

Nokia   Care  

Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/143/2008( Date of Filing : 26 Nov 2008 )1. Binay Kumar Jaiswal Road No 14, Kuluptanga , Adityapur , Dist Seraikella - Kharewan Purbi SinghbhumJHarkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vivek Tulsyan , Prop Nokia Care Centre G-35 , Akash Ganga...

Case Number: 143

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2008

|

Date of Upload: 24-02-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Care in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Care ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Care under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.