Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 462 of 2011 1. Deepak GargR/o # 2020, (HIG Flats)Sector 47/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Canara BankSCO No. 63, Sector 47/C, Chandigar...
Case Number: 462
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate A.D.Benny
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/07/10591. VasuKottukkal House, Chenthrappinni, Kodungallur Rep by Son DineshThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Canara BankCanara Bank, ChenthrappinniThrissurKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENTH...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH PATHAK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4051 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 04/08/2010 in Appeal No. 640/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. CANARA BANKThrough Senior Manager, Delhi Meerut Road, Opp. D.N. CollegeMeerutUttar Prades...
Case Number: 4051
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2011
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL DISPUTES FORUM,BANDRA3rd floor,New ADM BLDG. Near Chetna College,Bandra(E)-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/34 1. Surendra Singh JaiswalH/04/204, Moraj Residency, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Canara BankR D Shah Bldg., O...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/03/658(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2003 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/00/129 of District Mumbai)1. VIJAYKUMAR SHAH5 H/292, BHANU JYOTI, L.N. ROAD, MATUNGA, MUMBAI - 400 ...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Palakkad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 15 Of 20111. ShajinaD/o.Late Nawabjan.S, Vakkavil House, Kanimangalam, Nemmara, Chittur TalukPalakkad2. ShabanaD/o.Late Nawabjan.S, Vakkavil House, Kanimangalam, Nemmara, Chittur TalukPalakkad3. NishanaD/o.Late Nawabjan.S, Vakkavil House, Kanimangalam, Nemmara, Chittur Tal...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Canara Bank Canara Bank Electricity Board Electricity
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate M.R.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/2231. CANARA BANKREP.BY THE MANAGER AND A PRINCIPAL OFFICER OF SOUTH BRANCH, ERNAKULAMERNAKULAMKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDREP.BY THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.THIRUVANANTHAPURAMKerala2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3900 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/08/2010 in Appeal No. 889/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GURVINDER SINGHV.P.O. Mehna SarjaBathinda - 151201Punjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. CANARA ...
Case Number: 3900
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH PATHAK
Respondant Advocate MR. S.N. BHAT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1700 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1289/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. CANARA BANKThrough its Chief Manager, No. 18, K.H. Road, ShanthinagarBanglore - 560027Karnat...
Case Number: 1700
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Canara Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Canara Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Canara Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.