Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/245(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2005 in Case No. CC/05/27 of District Nashik)1. SHRI. MADHAV D. KALE PROP. OF SAPTSHRUNGI BUILDER AND CONTRACTOR16/5, INDIRA NAGAR, NASHIK...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/245(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2005 in Case No. CC/05/27 of District Nashik)1. SHRI. MADHAV D. KALE PROP. OF SAPTSHRUNGI BUILDER AND CONTRACTOR16/5, INDIRA NAGAR, NASHIK...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/245(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2005 in Case No. CC/05/27 of District Nashik)1. SHRI. MADHAV D. KALE PROP. OF SAPTSHRUNGI BUILDER AND CONTRACTOR16/5, INDIRA NAGAR, NASHIK...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr Sachin Pawar
Respondant Advocate Mr Vishal S Tambat
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/245(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2005 in Case No. CC/05/27 of District Nashik)1. SHRI. MADHAV D. KALE PROP. OF SAPTSHRUNGI BUILDER AND CONTRACTOR16/5, INDIRA NAGAR, NASHIK...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDAKUMAR S. LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 864 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 25/11/2010 in Appeal No. 4050/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. RAGHAVA BUILDER & DEVELOPERS & ANR.52, 10th Cross, 2nd Main W.O.C. Road, 2nd Stage, Maha...
Case Number: 864
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2011
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Y.V.Kadam
Respondant Advocate S.D.Kale
Complaint Case No. cc/2009/3771. U.N.NayakBandra Mumbai...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kedar BuilderTadiawla Road Pune............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENTHONABLE MRS. S G Joshi MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERश्रीमती. अंजली द�...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. D.A. Sonwane
Respondant Advocate ADV.B.R.DESHMUKH
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurComplaint Case No. CC/10/210 1. Shri Bharat Haridas RamtekeNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M/s. Bali Builder and ContractorThrough Rajesh Beniprasad Bali, Plot No.38, Gittikhadan, Katol Road, Nagpur2. SHRI.SHAYAMRAO WASUDEO SURYAWANSI...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane
Appelant Advocate Anil Patil
Respondant Advocate J.P.Dubey
Consumer FroumThane Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Konkan Bhavan CBD Belapur, Navi MumbaiCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 77 1. Shri Pravin Raghoba PatilR/A.Tukaram Patil chawl Roon No.2 1st Floor,Near Pandhrinath Zym.Hill Road,chunnabhati,Mumbai 22MumbaiMaharastra...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE. Room No.214, 2nd Floor, Collector Office, Court Naka, Thane(W)Complaint Case No. CC/10/298 1. Kedarnath Kalpnath GuptaA/36 Near vijay Nagar, Shiv Markanday Temple, S.p Road, Antophil MumbaiMumbaiMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus....
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate P.B.Gurav.
Respondant Advocate
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/10/510 1. Satyjit Dinkarrao Jadhav, R/o.Tirawade, Tal-Bhudargad, Kolhapur(Complainant in Complaint No.510/10)2. Shri Ashraf Ayub Manga, R/o.36A/22, E Ward, Row Bunglow No.8, Phalake Compound, Tarabai Park, Near ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.