Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv.J.D.Shukla.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2017
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate B.T.Yadav
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/531. Mr. Matuk Dhari SinghRajaram Singh Comp., Datta Mandir Road, Vakola Bridge, Santacruz-East, Mumbai-55Maharastra.........
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane
Appelant Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pawar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/1641. Mr. Vikram prabhakar juvatkarflat no. A-605, 6th floor, Trimurti shopping & Residential 1st floor, plot no. 11, sec. 6, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai. , Trimurti shopping & Residential 1st floor, plot no. 11, sec. 6, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai. , Trimurti shopping...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane
Appelant Advocate Mr. Nilesh pawar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/1651. Mr. Karsan D. vazaflat no. B-103, 1st floor, trimurti paradise building, plot no. 16, sec 16, kamothe navi Mumbai thanemah...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Trimurti builder and DeveloperDutta bhavan, Trimurti shopping & Residential 1st floor, pl...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAMESH S. SHINDE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 156 OF 20111. M/S. OM POONAM ENLAVE CO-OP, HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITEDThrough Mr.JavedAbdul Wadood Sayyed, Om Poonam Enclave Co-Op, Housing Society Ltd, Near Old Golden Nest, Mira - BhayanderRoad, Mira - Road,...
Case Number: 156
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2011
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/6791. ROYAL BUILDER & DEVELOPERSGEETA NAGAR SURVEY NO.529 HISSA NO 23&25,MIRA ROAD EAST THANE-07...........Complainant(s)V...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
MaharastraPuneMaharastraPuneComplaint Case No. CC/08/339 1. M.B. PAPARIKARPunePuneMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. RAJESH BUILDERPunePuneMaharashtra ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Smt. Pranali Sawant ,PRESIDENT Smt. Sujata Patankar ,MEMBER PRESENT : Dated : 03 Aug...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
MaharastraPuneMaharastraPuneComplaint Case No. cc/10/89 1. 1)Shri Vidyasagar P Chopade 2)Mrs Sampada Vidyasagar Chopade.R/o,Roddhi Enclave,R/3/7,Near Ganapati Chowk,Viman nagar,Pune. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M Dir Kumar Builder Consortium.2nd Floor,2413 East Street, Pune....
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.B.Prabhalwarkar
Respondant Advocate ..
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/03/1642(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. First Appeal No. of District Thane)1. SHRI. SUBHASH HIRALAL JAGTAPVARTAK NAGAR, 50/2206, M.H.B.POST, J.K.GRAM, THANE-400606......
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/11/831. Sri. Sri. Rajeshwarananda Puri Swamy Pitadapathigalu Aged about 40 YearsR/at Shivesharane, Sri. H...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.