Builder
Latest Judgments
Total 929 Consumer Court Cases Against Builder.
KISAN JAWALE V/S M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDER & DEVELOPERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJESH PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3211. M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERSPARTNER MR TANAJI PANDURANG CHAVAN SHOP NO 17 SHIVAM APTS PLOT NO 48 SECTOR 18 KAMOTHE NAVI MUMBAI THANEMAHARASHTRA .....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SMT DIPTI BHOR V/S M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDER & DEVELOPERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJESH PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3211. M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERSPARTNER MR TANAJI PANDURANG CHAVAN SHOP NO 17 SHIVAM APTS PLOT NO 48 SECTOR 18 KAMOTHE NAVI MUMBAI THANEMAHARASHTRA .....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
BHARAT ACHOR E V/S M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDER & DEVELOPERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJESH PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3211. M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERSPARTNER MR TANAJI PANDURANG CHAVAN SHOP NO 17 SHIVAM APTS PLOT NO 48 SECTOR 18 KAMOTHE NAVI MUMBAI THANEMAHARASHTRA .....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SACHIN SUREH KALSEKAR V/S M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDER & DEVELOPERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJESH PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3211. M/S SIDHESHWAR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERSPARTNER MR TANAJI PANDURANG CHAVAN SHOP NO 17 SHIVAM APTS PLOT NO 48 SECTOR 18 KAMOTHE NAVI MUMBAI THANEMAHARASHTRA .....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MODERN METATECH BUILDER V/S PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PATTANAIK AND PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate MR. ANUKUL CHANDRA PRADHAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1141 OF 2007(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission None)1. PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA-...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MODERN METATECH BUILDER-...........Respondent(s) REVISION ...
Case Number: 1142
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2012
Shri.Sunil Bapusaheb Shinde ,Pramotoreer & Builder V/S Sou .Surekha Yashwant Darawatkar
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2015
M/s.Opel Shelters Pvt.Ltd,through Hemendra Dyanba Shah promoters & Builder V/S Smt.Pushpa Narayan Kadam
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Adv.Jayshree Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/4851. Smt.Pushpa Narayan KadamMonkey Hill,Gagangiri Ashram,KhopoliRaigadMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s.Opel Shelters Pvt.Ltd,through Hemendra Dyanba Shah promoters & BuilderKunal House,opp Kamala Neharu Park,Bhandarkar Road,Pune 05PuneMaha........
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vidya Builder through 1) Shri. Hemant Tukaram Buddhiwant V/S Smt. Sudarshan Chandrakant Tikar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/07/1465(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2007 in Case No. 09/2007 of District Pune)1. Smt. Sudarshan Chandrakant TikarThrough Shri. Ramakant Pandurang Patange, Above Sai Dry Frui...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NO.1 M.P. HOME BUILDER MANDAL SAGAR SAMPATTI OFFICER NO.2 M.P. HOUSINGH BOARD SAGAR V/S DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN
Court Name: Damoh
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2016
Vidya Builder through Shri. Hemant Tukaram Buddhiwant V/S Smt. Kalpana Anil Jadhav
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/07/1466(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2007 in Case No. 10/2007 of District Pune)1. Smt. Kalpana Anil JadhavThrough Shri. Ramakant Pandurang Patange, Above Sai Dryfruits, Main ...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.