company-name-logo

Builder

Latest Judgments

Total 956 Consumer Court Cases Against Builder.

Maharashtra

B.S. Jakapure Builder Contactar V/S Bhimashankar Ganpat Birajdar

Builder  

Court Name: Solapur

Appelant Advocate Jadav

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/12/341. Bhimashankar Ganpat BirajdarRohini colleny plot No. 90 H/42 Solapur Solapurmaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. B.S. Jakapure Builder Contactar Veermaty Jakapure 72-V- somani plot solapur So...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/s Mayfair Builder and developers V/S Ishak Ahmed Kachhi

Builder  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate Z M Shaikh

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/09/3651. Ishak Ahmed KachhiWanworie pune 45...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Mayfair Builder and developers1027 Nana peht pune 411002............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MS. Geeta S.Ghatge MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERCompl...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

RAYA ASSOCIATES BUILDER AND DEVELOPERS V/S MR. HIRA MUSAI YADAV

Builder  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane

Appelant Advocate ADV. VIJAY R. SHINDE

Respondant Advocate

ठाणे जिल्हा अतिरिक्त ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,कोंकण भवन, नवी मुंबई. Complaint Case No. CC/13/3761. MR. HIRA MUSAI YADAVC-18,SAINAGER , SUKHAPUR, NEW PANVEL-410206RAIGADMA...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Goa

The Builder Kai Kiran Constructions V/S Mr.Caesar Silveira

Builder  

Court Name: North Goa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM NORTH GOA, PORVORIM,GOAComplaint Case No. CC/13/871. Mr.Caesar SilveiraB-G4, Staywell Apartments, Sonarwado, Verlaq- Canca, Bardez-Goa 403510NorthGoa...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Builder Kai Kiran Constructions Office H No.:274...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S MADHU BUILDER AND DEVELOPERS V/S JAISHREE RAMCHAND MANIAL

Builder  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate UDAY WAVIKAR

Respondant Advocate

ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्‍हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S MADHU BUILDER AND DEVELOPERS, V/S JAYESH NARWANEY

Builder  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate UDAY WAVIKAR

Respondant Advocate

ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्‍हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Shiv Trupti Builder V/S Shri Raju Baburao Bagde

Builder  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv.Naidu, Karkare

Respondant Advocate Adv- Deshpande

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING3RD FLOOR, CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001 . P.H.NO. 0712-2546884Complaint Case No. CC/12/311. Shri Raju Baburao Bagde14, Vastushri Apartment,OmkarNagar,Ring Road,NagpurNagpurM.S............Complai...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

KENNETH RICHARD WHITTENBURY V/S M/S. MODI BUILDER & REALTORS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

Builder  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & YOWAN SHARMA

Respondant Advocate M/S. K. RAJENDRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 501 OF 2013 IN FA/54/20121. M/S. MODI BUILDER & REALTORS PVT. LTD. & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. KENNETH RICHARD WHITTENBURY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA R...

Case Number: 501

|

Date of Filing: 14-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2013

Maharashtra

DINESH K GALA , BUILDER V/S DATTARAM S PAWASKAR

Builder  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mrs. Gargi R. Bhatkar/Mr. Dinesh P. Sarvagod

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/261. DATTARAM S PAWASKARR/O. SHRI. AMBIKA DARSHAN CO. OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED) C.T.S. NO. 231 AND 232 AT VILLAGE KIROL, TALUKA KURLA, NEAR THAKUR INDUSTRIES, K...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

DESHMUKH BUILDER PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S GOPAL HIRALAL RAJBHOJ & 3 ORS.

Builder  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SURESHCHANDRA N. CHATAULE

Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND GUPTA, MR. ASHU GUPTA & MR. NATASHA NAUTIYAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4322 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Appeal No. 154/2012 & 322/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. GOPAL HIRALAL RAJBHOJ & 3 ORS.F-2/304, Deshmukh Homes, Aboli Co-Op Hsg,Scty Ltd. ...

Case Number: 4322

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.