Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & YOWAN SHARMA
Respondant Advocate M/S. K. RAJENDRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 501 OF 2013 IN FA/54/20121. M/S. MODI BUILDER & REALTORS PVT. LTD. & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. KENNETH RICHARD WHITTENBURY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA R...
Case Number: 501
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mrs. Gargi R. Bhatkar/Mr. Dinesh P. Sarvagod
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/261. DATTARAM S PAWASKARR/O. SHRI. AMBIKA DARSHAN CO. OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED) C.T.S. NO. 231 AND 232 AT VILLAGE KIROL, TALUKA KURLA, NEAR THAKUR INDUSTRIES, K...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURESHCHANDRA N. CHATAULE
Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND GUPTA, MR. ASHU GUPTA & MR. NATASHA NAUTIYAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4322 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Appeal No. 154/2012 & 322/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. GOPAL HIRALAL RAJBHOJ & 3 ORS.F-2/304, Deshmukh Homes, Aboli Co-Op Hsg,Scty Ltd. ...
Case Number: 4322
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KARUNESH TANDON
Respondant Advocate M/S. MISHRA ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4553 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1236/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.GTM House, G-5, Pushkar Encalve, Outer Ring Road, Paschim Vih...
Case Number: 4553
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KARUNESH TANDON
Respondant Advocate M/S. MISHRA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1237/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.GTM House, G-5 Pushkar Encalve, Outer Ring Road, Paschim Viha...
Case Number: 4554
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2013
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/16/2012( Date of Filing : 27 Dec 2011 )1. Mr. Brayan J. VazMangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Sequiera Star Home BuilderMangalore............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: For...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAMESH R. SHINDE, Advocate
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 47 OF 20121. M/S. OM POONAM ENCLAVE CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.The Mr. Javed Abdul Wadood Sayyed., Om Poonam Enclave Co-Op, Housing Society Ltd.New Old Golden Nest, Mira-Bhayander.,Road, Mira-Road (east), ...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2013
Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur
Appelant Advocate ADV. BHOSKAR
Respondant Advocate Adv. Balpande
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING3RD FLOOR, CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001 . P.H.NO. 0712-2546884Execution Application No. EA/12/21. SMT. RANJANA SURESH FEDDEWARHUDAKESHWAR NAKA, NAGPUR ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHRI. VINAY...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2020
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate DIPTI GANDHI
Respondant Advocate
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.