Builder
Latest Judgments
Total 956 Consumer Court Cases Against Builder.
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2016
MR. JAYESH C. SHIRSEKAR V/S EKVEERA BUILDER AND DEVELOPER AND ORS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANTOSH A. PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/14/95(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/01/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/12/138 of District Central Mumbai)1. EKVEERA BUILDER AND DEVELOPER AND ORS81-25, WORLI, B.D.D. MUMB...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s. Ganesh Builder and Developers Through shree Samir ,2)Gautan ,3) Shree Ajaj Farukh Patel V/S Sjree Milind Govind Jhadhav
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate No
Respondant Advocate
जिल्हा ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच, ठाणे .Complaint Case No. CC/291/20141. Sjree Milind Govind JhadhavAt. Floor Vally complex, Gumohar ,B No.2, R No 403, Deepali Park ,Majrally, BADHALAPUR (w), Tal AaMBERNATH 421503ThaneM...
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. SAGAR BUILDER V/S JAYESH S KINI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/1954(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. JAYESH S KINIC-113, SAGAR PARK, AMRUT NAGAR, GHATKOPAR (W), MUMBAI - 400 086...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. SAGAR BUILDER V/S DR. JEEVAN S. KINI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/1954(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. JAYESH S KINIC-113, SAGAR PARK, AMRUT NAGAR, GHATKOPAR (W), MUMBAI - 400 086...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. SAGAR BUILDER V/S MR. K.SANJIVA J. KINI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/1954(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. JAYESH S KINIC-113, SAGAR PARK, AMRUT NAGAR, GHATKOPAR (W), MUMBAI - 400 086...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. SAGAR BUILDER V/S VAIJAYANTI S. KINI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/1954(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. JAYESH S KINIC-113, SAGAR PARK, AMRUT NAGAR, GHATKOPAR (W), MUMBAI - 400 086...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Shridhar Builder V/S Smt. Sharda W/o Rajendra Pali
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Chandrashekhar H. Jaltare
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/14/41. Smt. Sharda W/o Rajendra PaliR/o. C/o Mr.Mahavir B.Patil Plot No.1055,Deo Nagar,Khamla Road,NagpurNagpurMaharashtra.............
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MODERN METATECH BUILDER V/S PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PATTANAIK & PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1141 OF 2007(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission None)1. PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA-...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MODERN METATECH BUILDER-...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&n...
Case Number: 1141
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2014
M/s. Trimurty builder & Developers, V/S Mr. K. v . SubRAMANiAN
Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane
Appelant Advocate Shri. D, b. Khamkar
Respondant Advocate Adv Rajkumar Jagtap
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.