Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K. DATTA ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. ANAND MAHESHWARI & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 13/05/2008 in Appeal No. 452/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTDBSES Bhawan, Nehru Place,New DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. PR...
Case Number: 2920
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2014
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHICONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92CC No.753/2014:In the Matter of:Sh. Sham Sunder KapurR/O. H.No.125/74 New Krishna Nagar,Gali NO.8, Delhi-110051ComplainantVsB.S.E.S. (Y.P.L.)Shakti Kiran Build...
Case Number: 753
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. FA/944/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/07/2013 in Case No. 600/13 of District East Delhi)1. R.K. SHARMAR/O A/4, PLOT NO. 32 ORIENTAL ENCLAVE, INDRAPRASTHA EXT. DELHI 11...
Case Number: 944
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. FA/515/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/02/2013 in Case No. 1296/2005 of District South II)1. RANBIR SINGHR/O 111/9, KISHAN GARH,VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI...........Appella...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: North
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/227/20141. RAJESH3A, 2nd FLOOR, 579, GALI BADA MANDIR, GALI GHNANTESHWAR, DELHIDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BSES YAMUNA POWERCHANDNI CHOWK, DELHIDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sh. Babu Lal PRESIDENTHON'BLE ...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: North
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ROOM NO.2, OLD CIVIL SUPPLY BUILDING,TIS HAZARI, DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/191/20141. BAKHTAWAR SINGH4564, DEPUTY GANJ, SADAR BAZAR, DELHIDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BSES YAMUNA POWERBUSINESS MANAGER, ARAM BAGH, PAHAR GANJ, DELHIDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SUMAN CHAUHAN & MR. JIVESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3050 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/05/2013 in Appeal No. 23/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SURINDER SINGHS/O SH. BHAGWANT SINGH, R/O A-8 MIG DDA FLAT, PHASE-I, KATWARIA SARAI,NEW DELHI........
Case Number: 3050
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1347 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 24/01/2014 in Appeal No. 623/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RANDHIR SINGHH.NO-1B, Z BLOCK, (NEAR BANK OF BARODA) DAYAL SAR ROAD, UTTAM NAGARNEW DELHI = 11005...
Case Number: 1347
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI
Respondant Advocate MR. M.L. MINOCHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3255 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/05/2006 in Appeal No. 350/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.PUNJABI BAGH NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MR. SIKANDAR LAL ...
Case Number: 3255
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K. DATTA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4317 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/07/2012 in Appeal No. 243/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD.Through it C.E.O. Shakti Building, KarkardoomaDELHI - 110092...........Peti...
Case Number: 4317
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bses in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bses ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bses under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.