Bptp
Latest Judgments
Total 378 Consumer Court Cases Against Bptp.
BPTP V/S Jugal Kishore Sindhu
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-109/2016 Dated: O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, i.e. Rs.30,84,828/-(BSP) as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to en...
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2018
M/S. BPTP Resort Pvt.Ltd. V/S Swati Mitra Nee Guha Thakurta & Anr.
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-281/2013 Dated: O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, i.e. Rs.29,25,000/-(BSP) as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to en...
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2018
M/S. BPTP V/S Ashok Kumar Vohra
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-36/2014 Dated: O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, i.e. Rs.55,63,950/-(BSP) as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to ent...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2018
M/S. BPTP Ltd. V/S Arpan Kumar
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC/742/2014Present :-Counsel for Complainant Sh. Desh Raj.Counsel for OP Ms. Pratibha Singh.It is stated on behalf of complainant that he wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground that this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain t...
Case Number: 742
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2018
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2018
BPTP LTD. V/S MEENA YADAV
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 06.09.2018Complaint No.178/2011In the matter of:Ms. Meena Yadavw/o. Sh. Mahender Yadav,R/o. H. No. 1689, Sector-B,Vasant Kunj, New Delhi:ComplainantVersusBPTP Limited...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
M/S. BPTP Ltd. V/S Vikas Goyal
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-1101/2013 Dated: O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of flat exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, i.e. Rs.64,44,255/-(Basic Sale Price) as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdic...
Case Number: 1101
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2018
M/S. BPTP Ltd. V/S Debu Das Gupta & Anr.
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-674/2013 Dated: O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, i.e. Rs.64.5 lacs(basic sale price), as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary J...
Case Number: 674
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2018
M/S. BPTP Ltd. V/S Anil Gandhi & Anr.
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC/08/2013 Date:24/08/2018Present :-Counsel for Complainant Sh. N.S. Yadav.Proxy counsel for OP Sh. Sachin GhaiIt is stated on behalf of complainant that she wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground that this Forum...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2018
M/S. BPTP Ltd. V/S Ritu Chaudhary
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC/1125/2013 DATE:24/08/2018Present :-Counsel for Complainant Ms. Monika Singh.Proxy counsel for OP Sh. Sachin Ghai.It is stated on behalf of complainant that she wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground that this Forum does not have Pe...
Case Number: 1125
|
Date of Filing: 25-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bptp in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bptp ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bptp under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.