Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.D SAINI
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :09.10.2019Date of Decision : 17.10.2019 COMPLAINT NO.514/2017In the matter of: Kishore Kumar Samal,S/o. Late Dhaneshwar Samal,Krishna Kumar Swani,W/o. Kishore Kumar S...
Case Number: 514
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAMAN GAUR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No. 679 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 31.10.2017 Date of Decision: 28.08.2019R.D. Verma son of late Shri Geeta Ram, resident of House No.746, Sector 29, Faridabad (Haryana)-121008.…..C...
Case Number: 679
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAHUL RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :05.08.2019Date of Decision :02.09.2019 COMPLAINT NO 646/2014In the matter of:1. SANDEEP BATRA S/O L.C. BATRA, R/O H.NO. 793, SEC-8 FARIDABAD (HARYANA), PIN-1210062. ...
Case Number: 646
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BY POST
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 246 of 2019Date of Institution: 08.03.2019Date of Decision: 24.07.2019Sunita Goyal w/o Shri Dhanvir Goyal, resident of House No.965, Sector 7C, Faridabad.…….Appellant-Decree HolderVer...
Case Number: 246
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 16.07.2019 Date of Decision : 19.07.2019 Complaint No.493/2014 In the matter of:-Sh. Subroto Kumar,S/o Late Sudhindra Nath Kumar,R/o A-908, Amrapali Green,1/3, Vaibh...
Case Number: 493
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manju Gupta
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/368/2016( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2016 )1. Kirti GuptaLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BPTP Resort Pvt Ltd and Oth.New Delhi..............
Case Number: 368
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bptp in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bptp ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bptp under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.