company-name-logo

Bptp

Latest Judgments

Total 378 Consumer Court Cases Against Bptp.

NCDRC

RAMMOHAN BASLAS V/S BPTP LTD.

Bptp  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRAGYAN PRADIP SHARMA, MS. DEEPTI RAJPAL, MS. NIDHI TEWARI & SACHIN GHAI

Respondant Advocate MR.KAMAL MEHTA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1516 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 15/05/2019 in Complaint No. 456/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. BPTP LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. M-11, MIDDLE CIRCLE CONNAUGHT PLACE.NEW DELHI-110001.........

Case Number: 1517

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 23-12-2019

NCDRC

VIKAS YADAV V/S BPTP LTD.

Bptp  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate PRAGYAN PRADIP SHARMA, DEEPTI RAJPAL & NIDHI TEWARI, ADVOCATES.

Respondant Advocate MR. KAMAL MEHTA & MR. DEEPAK AGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1516 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 15/05/2019 in Complaint No. 456/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. BPTP LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. M-11, MIDDLE CIRCLE CONNAUGHT PLACE.NEW DELHI-110001.........

Case Number: 1518

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 23-12-2019

NCDRC

SARUCHI KAUNDIL V/S BPTP LTD.

Bptp  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRAGYAN PRADIP SHARMA, MS. DEEPTI RAJPAL, MS. NIDHI TEWARI & SACHIN GHAI

Respondant Advocate MR.KAMAL MEHTA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1516 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 15/05/2019 in Complaint No. 456/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. BPTP LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. M-11, MIDDLE CIRCLE CONNAUGHT PLACE.NEW DELHI-110001.........

Case Number: 1519

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 23-12-2019

Delhi

M/S. BPTP Ltd. V/S Sh. Jagat Pal Singh

Bptp  

Court Name: New Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CC/326/2014 DATE 03/12/2019 Present-Counsel for complainant Ms. Deepti.Counsel for OP Ms. Bharti.It is stated on behalf of complainant that she wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground that this Forum does not have...

Case Number: 326

|

Date of Filing: 02-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2019

Delhi

BPTP V/S AJAY SINGH CHAUDHARY

Bptp  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Delhi

BPTP V/S SUBIR CHATERJEE

Bptp  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Delhi

M/S BPTP V/S SURJEET SINGH

Bptp  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Delhi

M/S BPTP V/S RAJEEV KUMAR

Bptp  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Delhi

M/S BPTP LTD. V/S NAVEEN SHARMA

Bptp  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Delhi

M/S BPTP LTD. V/S ANOOP MAHESHWARI

Bptp  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:21.10.2019Complaint Case No. 471/2013In the matter of:Anindita PurkayasthaFlat No.C-105, Vivek Vihar (AWHO)Sector -82, Noida, UP – 201304.Indranil Chatterjee,F...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bptp in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bptp ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Bptp under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.