Bharti Airtel
Latest Judgments
Total 971 Consumer Court Cases Against Bharti Airtel.
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2016
Bharti Airtel Ltd. V/S Ajay Kumar J. Panicker
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Rajrathnam baddam, Sameer Ghonge, Kailash Chavan
Respondant Advocate
EA No 32 Of 20121. Ajay Kumar J. Panicker12-A, 1st Floor, Bldg.No.32, Rajabahadur Mansion, Ambalal Doshi marg, Near BSE, Oppp to Bank of Maharashtra, Fort, Mumbai-1...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.7th Foor, Bldg.No.7, Interface, Link Road, Madal(W), Mumbai 400 06...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bharti Airtel Limited, V/S Ajit Singh
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Comp. in person
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 211 of 2012 1. Ajit SinghR/o # 3316, Sector 46/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel Limited,Plot No. 21, Rajiv Gandhi Chandiga...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. (TELE SERVICES) V/S ZIYA UDDIN ALVI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 398 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/01/2011 in Appeal No. 2688/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. ZIYA UDDIN ALVID-8, B.D.A. Colony, Kho-e-fizaBhopalMadhya Pradesh...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2012
BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. & ORS. V/S JAGDISH LAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KESHAV RAI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 369 OF 2012 IN RP/1111/20111. JAGDISH LAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. VI...
Case Number: 369
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2012
Bharti Airtel Limited, V/S Mrs. Rita Bhatnagar
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Comp. in person
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 306 of 2012 1. Mrs. Rita BhatnagarW/o Sh. Sharad Kumar Bhatnagar, Asstt. Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, CBO Section, Sector 7, Chandigarh, and R/o ...
Case Number: 306
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd, V/S Ajay Moshra
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sunil Sahore & Vaibhav Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 270 of 2012 1. Ajay MoshraC/o Matrix consultec, SCO No. 1138-1139, Sector 22/B, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd,thro...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
KISHORE KUMAR V/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4085 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/11/2011 in Appeal No. 20/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.Airtel Centre, Gurgaon, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IVGurgaonHaryana...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 4085
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2012
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD, V/S DINESH JAIN
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate MAHESH SHUKLA, TANUJA PATIL, SEEMA PAGEY
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/12/1931. DINESH JAIN312/2, SHAH & NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, S.J.MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI-13............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.