Bharti Airtel
Latest Judgments
Total 971 Consumer Court Cases Against Bharti Airtel.
M/s Bharti Airtel V/S Alok Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravi Bhushan
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/1390(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Alok Garg - BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENT For the Appellant...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bharti Airtel Limited & Others V/S Sankar Rai, The Sole Proprietor,
Court Name: Coimbatore
Appelant Advocate M.S.Balajee Sridhar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2015
The managing director, Bharti Airtel V/S Stanley Stevenson
Court Name: East Godavari
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate P.V.S.R.Murthy
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2019
1. Bharti Airtel Limited, V/S Mr. Peter Naronha
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/98/2012( Date of Filing : 15 Mar 2012 )1. Mr. Peter NaronhaAged 57 years, S/o Late Ignatius Noronha, Residing at Marice, 2 Cross, Shivabagh, Kadri, Mangalore 575 002. D.K. Rep. ...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2019
M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED, V/S Shri ARUNAVA MUKHERJEE,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 367 OF 20141. Shri ARUNAVA MUKHERJEE,40/13, C. R. Park, 2nd Floor,NEW DELHI - 110019............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,Through its Managing Director, Regd. Office: Bharti Crescent...
Case Number: 367
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2014
M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & ANR., V/S M/s NISSIN ABC LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/s KNM & PARTNERS,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 338 OF 20141. M/s NISSIN ABC LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,Through its Authorized Signatory, Shri Navin Panpalia, Regd. Office: 46C, Rafi Ahmad Kidwai Road, PS Park Street,KOLKATA............Complainant(s)Versus1. M...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. V/S PREM CHAND BANTHIA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SIDDHARTH BANTHIA
Respondant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3948 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/08/2011 in Appeal No. 673/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. PREM CHAND BANTHIAR/o Flat No-44, Plot No-99, Anamika Apartment, PatparganjNew Delhi - 110092.......
Case Number: 3948
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2014
M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & 3 ORS., V/S DR. UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 168 OF 2014 IN CC/235/20141. DR. UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & 3 ORS.,...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING ...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2014
Case Number: 877
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & 3 ORS., V/S DR. UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 235 OF 20141. DR. UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA,C/o Dr. Sachindranath Paul, Monikuthir, Flat F/2B, Bhatrapally, PO Nabapally, Barasat,KOLKATA - 700126............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & 3 O...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.