Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 05/09/2016ORDER Sh. Vaibhav Jain, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty t...
Case Number: 696
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Vishal Kumar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA Consumer Complaint No.745 of 31.10.2014Date of Decision: 01.09.2016Ravijeet Singh Dhindsa son of S.Jagroop Singh, resident of Ward No.5, Lakhvir Complex, Lalheri Road, Khanna, District Ludhiana.IInd Address:20, Birchbank RD Bram...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashish Mishra
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/114/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/06/2016 in Case No. C/250/2016 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Bharti Airtel and Oth.Lucknow...........App...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2016
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate YOGENDER MOHAN.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Complaint case No.:69 of 2016Date of Institution:28.03.2016Date of Decision:26.08.2016Parveen Kumar S/o Sh.S.S.Goel, R/o H.No.151, Sector-16, Panchkula.. ….ComplainantVersus1. Bharti Airtel Limited, SCO No...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2016
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON, NO ADVOCATE
Respondant Advocate
Addl. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban DistrictAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/12/871. AVANTIKA S. KARKARETHRU SATISH KARKARE, C.A., 101, VANSHAJ, VIDNYAN NAGAR, BAWDHAN, PUNE-21............Complainant...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:424 of 2016Date of Institution:15.06.2016Date of Decision:17.08.2016Jaskanwar Pal Singh s/o Sh.Lakhbir Singh, R/o H.No.814, First Floor, Sector 38-A, Chandigarh. 160014 …....
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 20PRESENT SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENTSRI.H.JANARDHAN, B.A.L., LL.B., MEMBERComplaint Case No. CC/1109/20151. Mukundan Koorma, S/o late Shri P.Kunhiraman,Aged 62...
Case Number: 1109
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2016
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/15/6971. RANA JOSE THALIATHS/O. DR. JOS THALIATH, THALIATH HOUSE, CC NO.43/333A, CITIZEN ROAD, KOCHI-682 018 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.,CITY OFFICE, S.L AVENUE, N.H.BYEPASS, MARAD...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of argument: 10.08.2016Date of Order: 22.08.2016First Appeal No.62/15In the matter of:Mrs. Ritu Vohra,D/o. Somnath Vohra,Plot No.23, 1st Floor,Pratap Nagar Near Hari Nagar Depot,...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Court Name: Dharwad
Appelant Advocate S.T.Patil
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/165/20161. Deepak V.RegeR/o:Rege Building,Near Toll Naka,DharwadKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The General Manager, Bharti Airtel Ltd,55,Divyashree Towers,Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore Karnataka............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'B...
Case Number: 165
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.