Bharti Airtel
Latest Judgments
Total 973 Consumer Court Cases Against Bharti Airtel.
Bharti Airtel Ltd. V/S Badri Prasad Poddar
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar Chowdhury
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/138/2017( Date of Filing : 11 Apr 2017 )1. Badri Prasad Poddar79, Lenin Sarani, Room no.4111A, 4th Floor, Commercial Point, Kolkata-700...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2018
Bharti Airtel Limited V/S Harsh Behal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:884 of 2017Date of Institution:15.11.2017Date of Decision:23.08.2018Harsh Behal s/o Late Sh.Shori Lal, R/o # 703/12, Sector 26, Chandigarh. ……..ComplainantVersus1] Bharti Airt...
Case Number: 884
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2018
The Nodel Officer, Bharti Airtel Ltd. V/S Arjun Yadav
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Anil Johar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/424/2017Date of Institution:26/05/2017Date of Decision:16/08/2018Arjun Yadav son of Late Shri Ramdev Yadav, Resident of House No.1627, Sector 26, Panchkula.…..ComplainantV E R S ...
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2018
Bharti Airtel Ltd. V/S Vineet Krishan
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravi Inder Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/865/2017Date of Institution:18/12/2017Date of Decision:16/08/2018Vineet Krishan son of Shri Ravinder Krishan, Resident of House No.306, Sector 9-D, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R...
Case Number: 865
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2018
M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd, Rep. by its Managing Director V/S J. Nesarajan, S/o Jacob Rajan
Court Name: Pondicherry
Appelant Advocate Mr. R. MUGUNDHAN
Respondant Advocate OP1 Kamalakumar, OP2 EXpart
Final Order1Final Order2Complaint Case No. CC/11/2017( Date of Filing : 03 May 2017 )1. J. Nesarajan, S/o Jacob RajanNo.10, 3rd cross Street ,North, Suriyagandhi Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd, Rep. by its Managing DirectorOc...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2018
The Nodal Officer, Punjab of Bharti Airtel Limited V/S Rajan Mehta
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:118 of 2018Date of Institution:26.2.2018Date of Decision:30.07.2018Rajan Mehta, Resident of 1174, Sector 15-B, Chandigarh (UT) 160015 …..ComplainantVersusThe Nodal Officer, Punjab of Bhart...
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Bharti Airtel Ltd V/S Anjali Bhandari
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sanjiv Pabbi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Misc. Application No.:MA/18/2018IN Consumer Complaint No.:CC/15/2018Date of Institution:22/05/2018Date of Decision:23/07/2018Anjali Bhandari d/o Sh. Jitender Bhandari, R/o H.No.27-A, Bhambri Enclave, Ananta Apar...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2018
BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. V/S HARSH MEHTA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:26.07.2018 First Appeal-105/2013(Arising out of the order dated 21.12.2012 passed in Complainant Case No. 294/2012 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (V...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2018
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.