Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. APARANA MATTOO & MS. RITIKA GAMBHIR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2014 IN RP/2042/20081. A. HAMAPANNA & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. BESCOM & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. APARANA MATTOO, MS. RITIKA GAMBHIR & MR. PURVESH BUTTAN
Respondant Advocate MR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2042 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 07/01/2008 in Appeal No. 2496/2007 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. A. HAMAPANNA & ANR.RESIDENT OF BURUUKOTE VILLAGE, DHARAMAPURA HOBLI, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADU...
Case Number: 2042
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGION OF LAWYERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3129 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/04/2012 in Appeal No. 2167/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. NAGAMMA & ANR.W/o Late Rajappa R/o Katihalli Village Chitradurga TalukChitradurgaKarnataka2....
Case Number: 3129
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2012
Court Name: Kolar
Appelant Advocate D.S. Ramagopal
Respondant Advocate B.S.Vijayakumari
The District Consumer Redressal ForumDistrict Office Premises, Kolar 563 101.Complaint Case No. CC/10/1671. Sri Mithra Electricals Prop N.R. Sudhakara, S/o N.V. Rudraiah, Aged About 40 Years, Gajanana Nilaya, 8th cross, Jayanagar, Kolar. BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDER BEFORE THE DISTR...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolar
Appelant Advocate D.S. Ramagopal
Respondant Advocate B.S. Vijaya kumari
The District Consumer Redressal ForumDistrict Office Premises, Kolar 563 101.Complaint Case No. CC/10/1711. M/s. Sri Mithra electricals Prop N.R. Sudhakara, S/o N.V. Rudhriah, Aged About 40 years, Gajanana Nilaya, 8th Cross, Jayanagar, Kolar. BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDER BEFORE THE ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/1757/2011( Date of Filing : 24 Sep 2011 )1. Smt. Bharya Bangalore-78...........Complaina...
Case Number: 1757
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KASHI VISHWESHWAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1548 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 07/09/2007 in Appeal No. 1241/2007 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. BESCOM & ORS.The Superintending Engineer (ELE) Maintenance Circle, Vidyanagara Main Road, Op...
Case Number: 1548
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.S. RAGHUNATHAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2740 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 31/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1023/2007 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. V. SRINIVASA MURTHYResiding at No. 8, Plan II, N.H.S. Layou, GovindarajanagarBangalore - 560...
Case Number: 2740
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 985 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/11/2010 in Appeal No. 4617/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BESCOMBESCOM, Sirsi - 581401Uttara KannadaKarnataka...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 985
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A & N ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 703 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 02/07/2010 in Appeal No. 2923/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. B.G. RAMESH...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. GENERAL MANAGER (ELECTRICAL), BESCOM & ORS..........
Case Number: 703
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bescom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bescom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bescom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.