Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T H Naqvi Sanjeev Sharma
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/2225(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Amritsar College of Engineering- BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Viren...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nizamabad
Appelant Advocate MV Narsimha Rao,Smt. Bhavana
Respondant Advocate
causetitlejudgement entryComplaint Case No. CC/47/20111. Sri K. Nagabhushanam S/o Byraiah, Sri K. Nagabhushanam S/o Byraiah,C/o Shop No:4, Dharmakantha Complex,Marwadigally, Nizamabad Andhra Pradesh. District:- Nizamabad State: Andhra Pradesh NizamabadAndhra Pradesh...........Com...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1809 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1223/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. S.C. KHANNAS/o R.L Khanna , R/o W.b 248 Ali MohallaJalandharPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versu...
Case Number: 1809
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3029 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/10/2011 in Appeal No. 494/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUSTThrough its Chairman AmritsarPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. M/...
Case Number: 3029
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2013
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate R.K.Bhukkal
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/3261. Parminder Singhson of Acvtar singh Prop. Vikas Variety store,7056,Mohalla Guru nanak pura ,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK SALATHIA & MR. MUKESH KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2851 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/10/2011 in Appeal No. 494/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. M/S. JASJIT BROTHERSThrough its Partner Smt Amarjit Kaur,W/o Jaswant Singh R/o Farid Bakshish Co...
Case Number: 2851
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KRISHAN SINGH DADWAL & MR. MUKESH PANDIT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2551 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/11/2011 in Appeal No. 1135/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUSTAmritsar Through its Executive OfficerAmritsarPunjab...........Petiti...
Case Number: 2551
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate M/S. J.R. MIDHA & CO. & DR. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 428 OF 2004(Against the Order dated 17/08/2003 in Complaint No. 17/2002 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)1. SH. AJAY GAUTAM35,VANKHANDESHWAR NAGAR GWALIOR ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. AMRITSAR EYS CLINIC &O...
Case Number: 428
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2004
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. CHABRA
Respondant Advocate MR. A.K. RAINA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 383 OF 1998(Against the Order dated null in Complaint No. of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. AMRITSAR TRANSPORT CO. LTD.-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. PIRAMAL HEALTH CARE LTD.-...........Responden...
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-1998
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2011
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.K.S.Sidhu
Respondant Advocate Sh.Vikas Singla,O.P.No.1.Sh.Ritesh Singla,O.P.No.2.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/508 1. Dinesh Kumarson of Sh.Vishwa Mittar C/o Suraj Bhan Vishwamittar, Commission A...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Amritsar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Amritsar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Amritsar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.