Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/99/2014( Date of Filing : 13 Feb 2014 )1. Yogesh VijayR/o-Qtr-D1/3,Indian Oil Nagar,Plot No.-2,Ward No.-10A,Opposite IFFCO Colony,Gandhidham,Gujarat............Complai...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2021
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate Adv. G. P. Jambakar
Respondant Advocate
District consumer Disputes Redressal Forum NandedVisava Nagar, V.I.P. Road, NandedComplaint Case No. CC/14/851. Amrapali Madhukar HarabadePanchvati Colony, Palodi Road, Manavat, Tq. ManavatParbhaniMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, L. I. C. & otherGandhi Nagar,...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHADAB ANWAR & MR. ZARTAB ANWAR
Respondant Advocate MR. BIPIN KUMAR, RAKESH KUMAR, NAVIN KUMAR SURESH CHANDRA SHARMA, & RUPESH KUMAR SINHA 1, 2 & 4
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2203 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 29/04/2014 in Appeal No. 290/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SANJAY SINGHA-104 SUMITRA APTS, POLYTECHNIC ROAD, JHAROODH,DHANBADJHARKHAND - 826001...........Pe...
Case Number: 2203
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHADAB ANWAR & MR. ZARTAB ANWAR
Respondant Advocate MR.BIPIN KUMAR, RAKESH KUMAR, NAVIN KUMAR SURESH CHANDRA SHARMA, & RUPESH KUMAR SINHA 1 TO 5
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2204 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 29/04/2014 in Appeal No. 291/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ALOK KUMAR JHAA-104 SUMITRA APTS, PLOYTECHNIC ROAD, JHAROODIH,DHANBADJHARKHAND - 826001.............
Case Number: 2204
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U. R. Timble
Respondant Advocate
Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panaji-GoaExecution Application No. EA/04/2013InCC/02/20111. Maheshbabu Babubhai Patel & othersDona Paula GoaNorthGoa2. Rekha Maheshbabu Patel 107, Park Road, NW43PA, UK...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Amrapali Realtors & others...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U. R. Timble
Respondant Advocate
Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panaji-GoaExecution Application No. EA/04/2013InCC/02/20111. Maheshbabu Babubhai Patel & othersDona Paula GoaNorthGoa2. Rekha Maheshbabu Patel 107, Park Road, NW43PA, UK...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Amrapali Realtors & others...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.C. BERI & SURESH K. BERI, Advcoate
Respondant Advocate MS. ASTHA TYAGI & MR. SURESH SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2013 IN CC/271/20111. AMRAPALI VILLAGE RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUS...
Case Number: 222
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2217 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/09/2010 in Appeal No. 2600/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. KRISHNA M. RAOProp Krishna Agency, Gokul Complex, Karkala Road,Padubidri-574111Karnataka.......
Case Number: 2217
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2013
Case Number: 737
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.C. BERI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 7 OF 20111. AMRAPALI VILLAGE RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONBH-808, Amrapali Vill, Gyan Khand-II, Indirapuram,Ghaziabad-201010U.P...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.Corpo...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Amrapali in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Amrapali ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Amrapali under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.