Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.Krishnam Raju
CC NO. 147 Of 20131. 1. Dr. Manjul Chaudhary, W/o. Mr. Deepak Chaudhary Aged about 36 Years, Occ: Doctor, R/o. Plot No.2, Classic Home Farns Residency, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur Hyderabad-500 081.2. 2. Mr. Deepak Chaudhary S/o. Mr. Jagveer Singh Shaudhary aGed about 33 Years, R/o...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. B. Ravindra Reddy
Respondant Advocate Mr. A. Krishnam Raju ? OP1
CC NO. 31 Of 20131. 1. Mr. Vijai Chennupati, s/o. Narasimha Rao Chennupati, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Plot No.158, H.No.5-4-1286, Phase III, Sharada Nagar, Visakhapatnam, Hyderabad-500 070.2. 2. Mr. Narasimha Rao Chennupati, s/o. SEetharamaiah, Aged about 68 Years, ...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.S. Prashanth Kumar
Respondant Advocate Mr. A. Krishnam Raju OP1 & OP2
CC NO. 23 Of 20131. Mr. Alieni jagadeeshwar Rao, S/o. A. Balakrishan Rao, aged about 38 Years, Occ: sevice, presently residing at 1550, Technology Dr. Unit 4039, San Jose, Ca- 95110, USA though his G.P.A. holder2. Mr. G.Laxman Rao, s/o. G.301, narnada Rajyalakshmi Residency, yada...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.S. Prashanth Kumar
Respondant Advocate Mr. A. Krishnam Raju OP1 & OP2
CC NO. 24 Of 20131. Mr. Pramod Rao Janagama s/o. late Sri Rajeswar Rao Aged about 35 years, Occ: Sevice, Presently residing at 5783, barabara Dr. Hilliard OH 43026, USA, temporarily came down to Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Aliens Developers pvt. ltd., Rep....
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. A.M. Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.Krihsnam Raju - OP's 1 and 2
CC NO. 119 Of 20121. Mr. Shankar Mazumder, S/o. Late Manoj Kumar Mazumder, Aged about 35 Years, Occ:IT Professional,R/o. Flat No.601, Vishnu Shreyas CHS, Plot No.87/87A, Sector 50 New, Seawoods West, Nerul, Navi Mumbai-4...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Aliens Developers (P)...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Gourisankara Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s.A.Krishna Raju
Complaint Case No. CC/16/20121. SMT. KRATI RUNGTA, W/O SRI VIKASH RUNGTA, R/O 1ST FLOOR, 19 KN, GOVINDA REDDY LAYOUT,AREKERE MICO LAYOUR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S ALIENS DEVELOPERS (P) LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, R/O FLAT NO.910,...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. A.M. Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.Krihsnam Raju - OP's 1 and 2
CC NO. 119 Of 20121. Mr. Shankar Mazumder, S/o. Late Manoj Kumar Mazumder, Aged about 35 Years, Occ:IT Professional,R/o. Flat No.601, Vishnu Shreyas CHS, Plot No.87/87A, Sector 50 New, Seawoods West, Nerul, Navi Mumbai-4...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Aliens Developers (P)...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Gourisankara Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s.A.Krishna Raju
Complaint Case No. CC/16/20121. SMT. KRATI RUNGTA, W/O SRI VIKASH RUNGTA, R/O 1ST FLOOR, 19 KN, GOVINDA REDDY LAYOUT,AREKERE MICO LAYOUR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S ALIENS DEVELOPERS (P) LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, R/O FLAT NO.910,...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate Mahmood Khan
Respondant Advocate A.Krishnam Raj
Case Number: 654
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. K. RADHA, MR. K. MARUTHI RAO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 754 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/07/2012 in Complaint No. 21/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. ALIENS DEVELOPERS P. LTD. & 2 ORS.REP. ITS MANAGING DIRECTORS & JOIT MANAGING DIRECTOR,...
Case Number: 754
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Aliens Developers in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Aliens Developers ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Aliens Developers under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.